New England Patriots
No excuses not to find tomorrow’s game on TV
12:13 PM EST on Friday, December 28, 2007
FOXBORO — After the NFL made the surprise and unprecedented decision on Wednesday to let both NBC and CBS simulcast tomorrow’s Patriots-Giants game to ensure that fans who do not receive NFL Network would be able to watch the game as well, it was hailed by those who would be able to enjoy the historic game in their homes as usual.
But for Bill Belichick, having New England on three networks — four if you’re a Boston or New York resident as the local ABC affiliate will simulcast it as well— it might be a bit of overkill.
A kind of overkill generally reserved for a higher power than himself and his football team.
“It will be like the State of the Union address — you can flip to every channel and see it,” Belichick joked yesterday.
It is the first time since Super Bowl I, then called the AFL-NFL World Championship, that a game will be simulcast on more than one network. For the Jan. 15, 1967, title game between the Green Bay Packers and Kansas City Chiefs, the game was carried on NBC and CBS.
Asked about the move, Belichick pointed out the obvious: “I’m not planning on watching it.”
Quick kicks…
Three players didn’t take part in practice for New England yesterday, which was held inside the Dana-Farber Fieldhouse: Nick Kaczur (foot), Kyle Brady (foot) and Kyle Eckel (stomach). Tom Brady (right shoulder), Benjamin Watson (ankle), Willie Andrews (elbow), Rodney Harrison (thigh), Stephen Neal (shoulder), and Billy Yates (shoulder) were all limited.
|
More top stories
Most Viewed Yesterday
Patriots journal: Porter says refs have different rules for Brady
Governor vetoes R.I. saltwater fishing license
Narragansett sachem: ‘Outsiders’ no more after Obama meeting
Most active surveys
React to Carcieri's veto of R.I.'s first saltwater fishing license
What's your favorite breakfast/lunch place?
Are the Yankees on the brink of another dynasty?
Will you get vaccinated against swine flu this year?
Will you allow your children to be vaccinated against swine flu? Why or why not?
Most e-mailed in the last 24 hours
Reader Reaction










You must be logged in to contribute. Log in | Register Now!
You are logged in as screenname | Log Out
You are logged in, but do not have a "screen" name. Create a Screen Name