Letters to the editor
| Recommended 
Explanation, please!
01:00 AM EST on Thursday, November 2, 2006
I was very surprised and disappointed to read that The Journal gave its endorsement for approval of the Harrah's-Narragansett casino, Question 1 ("Allow a third casino," Oct. 22). This is a complete reversal of its previous position that was stated on many occasions. What is perplexing is that The Journal makes no mention of its previous positions and why it has reversed its opinion.
What is going on here?? I am expecting The Journal to explain why it has changed its opinion. Is it because advertising revenue, current and future, has influenced its position? The Journal owes an explanation to the citizens of Rhode Island, or it is no better than those who have been the object of their reporting for participating in back-room deals.
JIM MORETTI
Smithfield
 | H1N1 and Pets: Felines, Ferrets and Flu |
 | Barrington's affordable housing puts opportunities within reach for mother, daughter |
 | Police seize large quantity of marijuana in Woonsocket |
We want to hear from you
More letters to the editor
Most Viewed Yesterday
No driver’s license? For many, no problem
Some immigrants in Central Falls are afraid to give info to the government
PC 91, Stonehill 55: Peterson gets a lot done
Most active surveys
What's your favorite breakfast/lunch place?
Are the Yankees on the brink of another dynasty?
React to Carcieri's veto of R.I.'s first saltwater fishing license
Will you allow your children to be vaccinated against swine flu? Why or why not?
Is it a bad thing or a good thing that prostitution is legal in Rhode Island, indoors?
Most e-mailed in the last 24 hours
Reader Reaction
You must be logged in to contribute. Log in | Register Now!
You are logged in as screenname | Log Out
You are logged in, but do not have a "screen" name. Create a Screen Name