Letters to the editor
01:00 AM EDT on Saturday, June 25, 2005
When one tries to defend the indefensible, he gets the type of article that Robert A. Walsh Jr. wrote in his "Deconstructing teacher-pension analysis" = (June 16.)
I am afraid that Mr. Walsh completely missed the point. Whether the number is $64,700 or $51,076, both are still a lot of money. Whether the working days are 250 or 187, teachers work a lot less days than the private sector. Whether teachers pay 9.5 percent or not, they have a defined- benefits plan. And finally, there is health care. While most taxpayers pay 25 percent or more of their monthly health-insurance premiums, teachers pay virtually nothing.
In summary Mr. Walsh: Teachers make a very high wage for fewer days worked, have a defined-benefits plan, most have virtually free health care and will continue to have health care into retirement. I guess you do not realize that most taxpayers, who pay for this largess, have none of these benefits!
Who is pushing his political agenda?
MICHAEL MANCUSO
East Greenwich
We want to hear from you
More letters to the editor
Most Viewed Yesterday
Politics of religion: Kennedys and the Catholic Church
Lawyers to get $59 million from Station fire settlement
About 150 gather in Warwick for Tea Party’s first open meeting
Most active surveys
Who will win the PC-URI basketball game?
Will you skimp on Thanksgiving dinner this year? If so, where?
Would you trade Clay Buchholz and Casey Kelly for Roy Halladay?
Most e-mailed in the last 24 hours
Reader Reaction









You must be logged in to contribute. Log in | Register Now!
You are logged in as screenname | Log Out
You are logged in, but do not have a "screen" name. Create a Screen Name