Letters to the editor
01:00 AM EDT on Saturday, June 25, 2005
When one tries to defend the indefensible, he gets the type of article that Robert A. Walsh Jr. wrote in his "Deconstructing teacher-pension analysis" = (June 16.)
I am afraid that Mr. Walsh completely missed the point. Whether the number is $64,700 or $51,076, both are still a lot of money. Whether the working days are 250 or 187, teachers work a lot less days than the private sector. Whether teachers pay 9.5 percent or not, they have a defined- benefits plan. And finally, there is health care. While most taxpayers pay 25 percent or more of their monthly health-insurance premiums, teachers pay virtually nothing.
In summary Mr. Walsh: Teachers make a very high wage for fewer days worked, have a defined-benefits plan, most have virtually free health care and will continue to have health care into retirement. I guess you do not realize that most taxpayers, who pay for this largess, have none of these benefits!
Who is pushing his political agenda?
MICHAEL MANCUSO
East Greenwich
| Animal Behaviorist, Christine Johnson | |
| Sweetbriar provides opportunities for Tara Dodson and her daughter Avery | |
| Police seize large quantity of marijuana in Woonsocket |
We want to hear from you
More letters to the editor
Most Viewed Yesterday
Patriots journal: Porter says refs have different rules for Brady
Governor vetoes R.I. saltwater fishing license
Narragansett sachem: ‘Outsiders’ no more after Obama meeting
Most active surveys
React to Carcieri's veto of R.I.'s first saltwater fishing license
What's your favorite breakfast/lunch place?
Are the Yankees on the brink of another dynasty?
Will you get vaccinated against swine flu this year?
Will you allow your children to be vaccinated against swine flu? Why or why not?
Most e-mailed in the last 24 hours
Reader Reaction









You must be logged in to contribute. Log in | Register Now!
You are logged in as screenname | Log Out
You are logged in, but do not have a "screen" name. Create a Screen Name