Letters to the editor
Why to vote for uncommitted delegates
01:00 AM EST on Saturday, March 1, 2008
Political columnist Charles Bakst’s Feb. 24th column, “Clinton in battle for R.I. voters,” highlights an “A-list” of state-elected officials and Democratic politicos, who support either Sen. Barack Obama or Sen. Hillary Clinton. Not mentioned is that there are many Democrats throughout the state who remain uncommitted.
As a long-time “committed” Democrat who is “uncommitted” as to who he supports, I made a decision to run as an uncommitted delegate in Congressional District 1. By doing so, I am not pledged to any particular candidate at the Democratic National Convention this summer. This gives me more latitude at the political gathering in making the best choice to pick a candidate with the greater chance to win.
Both Democratic contenders have great possibilities but also political liabilities. Although some see Senator Clinton as having more political and foreign-policy experience, Senator Obama is viewed as the candidate for change who has vision and leadership. He generates energy and sizzle, supporters say, bringing a younger generation into the political process. Many of their policy positions are similar; some very different, such as health care.
Would the Illinois senator, seen as more liberal, be more vulnerable, energizing Republicans to go to the polls? Would it make sense to support the New York senator, considered a centrist, but who carries political baggage and the hatred of the political and religious right?
It is crucial that the right candidate be chosen, one who can easily beat the Republican frontrunner, Sen. John McCain. Which Democratic candidate can pull the party faithful, uncommitted voters and independents into the polls?
With this election still so close, some say that the 2008 Democratic presidential nominee could be chosen at the Denver convention. Newspapers speculate that super delegates might well tip the balance to either candidate. Even though it will be much harder to be elected as uncommitted delegate, my candidacy gives Congressional District 1 voters a voice if they are uncomfortable with either of the two Democratic presidential candidates.
As The Journal reports, many Rhode Islanders know whom they will vote for. For those who choose not to declare their support at this time, consider marking your ballot “uncommitted.” Even though the media have been silent about this option, you do have more choices than you think.
HERB WEISS
Pawtucket
| Cigars are smoking | |
| Bristol float retells the story of George Mendonsa of Middletown, known as the Kissing Sailor | |
| Weather brings down tree limb on house in Cranston |
We want to hear from you
More letters to the editor
Most Viewed Yesterday
Senate commission to study marijuana decriminalization
Jury awards Roger Williams hospital patient $3.9 million
Supporters of state name change poised to woo voters’ support
Most active surveys
Why do you think Sarah Palin is prematurely stepping down as Alaska's governor?
How is this weather affecting you?
Should marijuana be decriminalized and taxed?
If the election for governor was held today, who would you vote for?
Most e-mailed in the last 24 hours
Reader Reaction









You must be logged in to contribute. Log in | Register Now!
You are logged in as screenname | Log Out
You are logged in, but do not have a "screen" name. Create a Screen Name