Editorials
No to Question 7
01:00 AM EDT on Sunday, October 15, 2006
If the State of Rhode Island were in a position to finance everything nice, we would favor approving Question 7 on the Nov. 7 ballot. This would authorize selling $4 million in bonds to continue restoring Fort Adams, in Newport, and to add to the recreational facilities there, at a total cost, including interest, of $7 million.
But these are tight times for state finances. So the City by the Sea is the most appropriate source now for funds to make the improvements, with help from the private groups that use Fort Adams. We are not convinced that the proposed improvements require state taxpayers to dig deeper into their pockets under current circumstances. No to Question 7.
| Summer Finally Starts for Misquamicut Businesses | |
| Archeological dig in Newport, 4 feet and 250 years down | |
| 34th Annual, Cape Verdean Independence Day festival |
We want to hear from you
More editorials
Most Viewed Yesterday
A gangster’s tale: New Dillinger film is close to the truth, Brown prof. says
Providence to host Fourth fireworks
Tough times prompt 3 communities to cancel July 4 fireworks shows
Most active surveys
Why do you think Sarah Palin is prematurely stepping down as Alaska's governor?
Is Rasheed Wallace a good addition for the Celtics?
Does Tim Wakefield deserve to be an All Star?
Most e-mailed in the last 24 hours
Reader Reaction









You must be logged in to contribute. Log in | Register Now!
You are logged in as screenname | Log Out
You are logged in, but do not have a "screen" name. Create a Screen Name