Contributors
Tom Plate: How China could give paranoids a rest
01:00 AM EST on Saturday, November 7, 2009
Los Angeles
Paranoid people tend to live longer, goes the old joke. And so it is in this spirit only — not out of a desire to engage in Cold War China-bashing — that we raise concerns about China. So here’s the paranoid’s question: Just what is China up to?
The facts are as follows. In parallel with its astonishing and commendable economic rise, China has put together new military architecture that’s enough to give one shivers. Of course, the military-rise syndrome is hardly unique to China. By and large, economic growth and military-buildups go hand in hand. Consider that even India has been sharpening its sticks and buying all sorts of military stuff. And this is in the historic l and of Gandhi, a.k.a. Mr. Non-Violence. It is rapidly lathering on layers of military muscle as its economy continues to surge. The United States, of course, spends more money on arms than anyone, by far. But China’s buildup is today’s topic, not America’s, or India’s — those are for another time.
China’s naval buildup is especially dramatic. It can’t just be waved off as a non-event. Even the most level-headed and serious Western experts, generally inclined to give Beijing the benefit of the doubt, are worried about what it might mean.
So is the government of Taiwan, of course. This bustling off-shore island, in the daunting shadow of the colossus of China’s mainland, is becoming more paranoid than American turkeys approaching Thanksgiving. It is particularly alarmed about the increase of short-range missiles pointed at them — now said to be close to 1,500. That’s roughly one Chinese missile for every nine square miles of tiny Taiwan’s turf — sort of ridiculous, don’t you think?
And while China’s missile count continues to mount, Taiwan’s territory does not. From a paranoid’s perspective, this is not restful-making. Thus, a recently released report from Taiwan’s Ministry of National Defense claims that China’s buildup has even gotten to the point where it is capable of deterring the intervention of other foreign militaries (read: U.S. and Japan) were China to consider going to war against the island.
It must be noted that Beijing considers Taiwan an integral part of China, and from its perspective any use of force would be an internal political matter, not an outside act of aggression. But legal niceties aside, the overall regional balance of military power may in fact be at the tipping point.
That view has another recent assessment also capable of keeping paranoids awake at night. The RAND Corporation author-experts David A. Shlapak, David T. Orletsky, Toy I. Reid, Murray Scot Tanner and Barry Wilson reached comparable conclusions in “A Question of Balance: Political Context and Military Aspects of the China-Taiwan Dispute.” In their considered view, the growing size and quality of China’s missile arsenal, along with other advances in Chinese military capabilities, call into question the basic ability of America and Taiwan to defend the island against a large-scale Chinese attack.
They also noted that China explicitly refuses to renounce the use of force against Taiwan, nor has it “withdrawn any missiles from the hundreds it points at Taiwan.” This, it seems to me, is a fair point. China’s government constantly proclaims a policy of “peaceful rising” even as it enlarges its international space economically and diplomatically. At the same time the Taiwan people have elected a government committed to peaceful negotiations with the mainland over the political future of Taiwan, specifically voting out the government that had been aggressively committed to Taiwan’s formal independence.
So the paranoid’s question is a simple one: If the mainland’s peaceful and bilateral relations with Taiwan are now so reasonable and promising, why is China barging ahead with its arms buildup like there’s no tomorrow? As we say, this is the standard paranoid’s way of looking at reality. I am not there — yet. But to quote an ancient Chinese saying (reading in pinyin literation): “xîng xîng zhî huo kì yi liáo yuán.” This means something like this: a single spark can start a fire that winds up burning the entire prairie.
That is, a single spark of doubt about the sincerity of China’s peaceful intentions could ignite a wildfire of fear and suspicion that could unnecessarily complicate its life and return world politics to a binary state of neo-Cold War.
So, here’s my idea: How about for starters, Beijing removes a few hundred of those missiles aimed at little Taiwan as a gesture of its true personal warmth (and aim them nowhere else)?
This, at least, could let some of the world’s internationally oriented paranoids finally get some rest — until the next paranoid crisis, of course.
Tom Plate, a frequent contributor, is a longtime writer and editor specializing in Asian affairs.
We want to hear from you
More editorials
Most Viewed Yesterday
CCRI is spread too thin to train 21st-century work force, report finds
Agent: Bay in contact with other clubs, but still prefers Boston
PC Friars open with a 96-53 blowout of Bryant
Most active surveys
Did Bill Belichick make the right call on fourth-and-2?
What’s your customer service experience been like while shopping recently?
Do you agree that Marshon Brooks is destined for stardom at PC?
Will the Patriots end the Colts' chances of a perfect season?
Most e-mailed in the last 24 hours
Reader Reaction









You must be logged in to contribute. Log in | Register Now!
You are logged in as screenname | Log Out
You are logged in, but do not have a "screen" name. Create a Screen Name