WASHINGTON -- FOUR YEARS AFTER our nation initiated military operations in Iraq, America demands a new approach to this open-ended conflict that has resulted in the deaths of more than 3,200 service members, including at least 25 with strong ties to Rhode Island. Our operations in Iraq have endangered the ability of our armed forces to respond to other crises, distracted from efforts to fight al-Qaida and the Taliban, and damaged our international reputation. Our military now finds itself in the middle of a civil war, and it is time to bring our troops home.

Despite calls by the Iraq Study Group for a new approach to the “grave and deteriorating” situation in Iraq, President Bush has proposed escalating military operations, sending more troops to prosecute a war mismanaged from the start by the civilian leadership. Fortunately, we have another choice. The House voted last week on an emergency spending bill that would, for the first time, set a clear deadline to end U.S. combat operations in Iraq. As one who originally voted against giving the president authority to invade Iraq, I proudly supported this Democratic measure as the first real step to end the war.

Last November, an American public dissatisfied with President Bush’s Iraq policy elected a Democratic Congress that promised a new direction. Having heard frustration from so many Rhode Islanders, I have worked with the Democratic leadership to develop a better strategy. I spoke of my conversations with military families and advocacy groups to underscore the sincerity and passion of Rhode Islanders’ call for change. Meanwhile, Democratic leaders consulted with an array of current and former military commanders, foreign-policy experts and advocates, with committees holding more than 100 hearings on operations in Iraq.

The House bill is the direct result of those efforts and reflects the will of the American people. Not only does it demand accountability by establishing clear benchmarks for Iraqis to take control of their own security, but it also sets a deadline to bring our troops home — no later than August 2008. This measure sends a clear signal to the president and the world that we do not intend to remain an occupying force in Iraq.

The Democratic bill also addresses other serious problems facing our military and their families. President Bush has recommended sending more troops into harm’s way, but has not provided the resources they need upon their return home, as demonstrated by reports of substandard care at such facilities as Walter Reed Medical Center. With nearly 25,000 American troops — among them 93 Rhode Islanders — injured in Iraq thus far, the House spending bill provides an additional $2.8 billion for military health care and $1.7 billion for veterans’ health care to ensure that those who have sacrificed for our nation get the support and treatment they deserve.

Furthermore, the bill adds critical funds to restore our military readiness and re-equip National Guard and Reserve forces, which face major shortages as a result of operations in Iraq. Lt. Gen H. Steven Blum, chief of the National Guard Bureau, has stated that 88 percent of Army Guard units and 45 percent of Air Guard units are unprepared for deployment as a result of equipment shortages. We depend on our National Guard to protect us in the event of catastrophes or natural disasters, and we must ensure they are fully prepared to defend the nation they serve.

The Iraqis’ problems no longer require a U.S. military solution. The underlying causes of violence are primarily political and must be addressed as such. Unlike the president’s plan, which promises more of the same failed policy, the Democratic approach will support the political process to end sectarian divisions in Iraq, help rebuild the economy and infrastructure, and promote maximum diplomatic efforts to bring an end to the violence.

Some have argued that the bill does not go far enough. Like them, I support an even earlier exit for our troops and have co-sponsored legislation to redeploy them out of Iraq by Dec. 31, 2007. However, the Democratic measure marks a major turning point and answers Rhode Islanders’ pleas by setting a firm deadline for withdrawal. This serves our troops, our constituents, and our conscience — and I will wholeheartedly support it.

James Langevin represents Rhode Island’s Second Congressional District.