Rhode Island news
BLB Investors says it can live with the adjustments in its bid to buy Lincoln Park. The legislation, which would also affect Newport Grand, goes to a special session Assembly vote in tomorrow.
01:26 AM EDT on Thursday, July 14, 2005
PROVIDENCE -- The Lincoln Park deal that looked like it might
never happen cleared a key House committee last night and is now on the
fast track to becoming law.
If approved by the full House and Senate tomorrow, the legislation would
provide millions of dollars in promised tax relief -- including the
elimination of the car tax -- through an expansion of gambling in the
state.
Helping to clear the way for the sale of Lincoln Park to new owners, BLB
Investors, the legislation extends long-term tax-rate guarantees to the
track in exchange for a commitment to a $125-million expansion to
accommodate 1,750 more video slots.
Journal photo / Kathy Borchers Rep. Al Gemma, D-Warwick, foreground, addresses the House Finance Committee yesterday on a proposed deal between BLB Investors and the state over the purchase of Lincoln Park. In background are BLB representatives David Barricelli, Len Wolman, and Matt Goss.
Unlike previous versions, the legislation approved last night by the
House Finance Committee extends a similar tax-rate guarantee to Newport
Grand to spur its owners into adding 800 slots there as part of a
$20-million expansion, which includes a new 90-room hotel.
The bill, which puts the imprint of House leaders on a bill that passed
the Senate in late May, also places a new caveat on the revenue share
promised to the state's Narragansett Indians.
The Narragansetts would still get 5 percent of the revenue from the new
slots at Lincoln Park, up to $10 million annually, but their share would
evaporate upon the opening of the proposed West Warwick casino or any
other gambling facility from which they receive money.
Other highlights include a new requirement that BLB Investors, the
consortium seeking to buy Lincoln Park, pay for all road improvements on
and to Route 146. Earlier versions had the state paying the first $5
million.
In addition to all the other tax promises in the bill, the new version
commits $5 million to a municipal aid program that benefits all 39 of
the state's cities and towns.
The commitment was added in response to complaints -- aired again last
night -- that $20 million of the new money was committed to a handful of
so-called distressed communities, including the home districts House
Speaker William J. Murphy and Senate President Joseph A. Montalbano.
"We're all Rhode Islanders. We just want a piece of the pie," said Rep.
Jan Malik, D-Warren.
Amended bills enabling Rhode Island Lottery Commission’s entry into
a master video lottery terminal contract with UTGR, Inc.:
The legislation was unseen until seconds before it was debated -- and
just an hour before it was approved 17 to 1 by the House Finance
Committee.
With the fate of the West Warwick casino still uncertain, House Minority
Leader Robert A. Watson, R-East Greenwich, the lone dissenter, described
last night's vote as a politically orchestrated attempt to put the
members of the House Finance Committee -- even those that oppose the
proposed casino -- on record in favor of expanded gambling.
The full House and the Senate are expected to return to the State House
for a one-day special session tomorrow to approve the final version of
the legislation hatched in two days of intense closed-door negotiations.
Newport Grand CEO Diane Hurley was ecstatic at the eleventh-hour
inclusion of her gambling house in the legislation. "We're very excited
about the projects. We really believe in them and this gives us the
ability to go forward now."
"We are very pleased with the result and very appreciative," echoed Len
Wolman, the chairman and CEO of the Waterford Group, one of the member
companies in BLB.
While BLB did not win the tax-parity guarantee it had sought with the
proposed Harrah's-Narragansett Indian casino, Wolman said the provision
lawmakers put in the bill instead "really protects us."
Instead of the parity clause, lawmakers found a way -- "slippage
protection" -- to guard both Lincoln Park and Newport Grand from losses
attributable to a new competitor in the Rhode island gambling market.
If the rate of growth at either facility was lower in any year than its
average growth during the previous four years, the difference would be
added to its percent of the revenue.
So, for example, if revenue dropped at either facility to 10 percent one
year -- after averaging 12 percent -- its share of the slot revenue
would increase by 2 percentage points.
The House negotiations also provided added protection for Lincoln Park
only in the last five years of BLB's potential 15-year contract with the
state. If the track does not see growth of at least 3.5 percent plus the
rate of inflation -- measured by the Consumer Price Index -- it gets an
extra share of slot revenues, up to 1 percent. Conversely, if BLB
exceeds that growth rate, the state gets a larger piece of that pie,
again up to 1 percent.
That additional protection would not apply to Newport Grand's potential
10-year contract with the state.
Lawmakers also tweaked the formula created to allocate the state's share
of the new money.
The largest chunk of the new state money -- 80.64 percent -- will go to
eliminate the car tax. Financing that elimination had previously been
capped at up to $125 million. Now there is no cap.
In the Senate-passed version of the bill, however, the six distressed
communities would have been paid first before the leftover money
cascaded into the other promised tax-relief efforts, including the
elimination of the car tax.
Up to $20 million will still go to the six communities -- Central Falls,
Pawtucket, Providence, West Warwick, Woonsocket and North Providence.
But these communities would no longer get first dibs on the money,
thereby speeding up the implementation of the other tax-relief programs,
including the car-tax phaseout.
The new bill also cuts in half the $10 million that had been earmarked,
out of the new slot revenue, for a program that provides tax refunds to
the elderly, disabled and poor. The other $5 million will now be used to
provide more money to all 39 cities and towns through general revenue
sharing.
With minimum employment guarantees, requiring Lincoln Park to have the
equivalent of 1,300 full-time workers and 360 at Newport Grand, George
H. Nee, secretary/treasurer of the state AFL-CIO, endorsed the measure.
A public hearing earlier in the day elicited complaints from several
Lincoln residents that the legislature was again poised to foist more
gambling on them without a statewide or local vote.
"We have had a casino incrementally, starting with the horsetrack back
in 1946, and then the dogtrack . . . simulcast, a few slots. How did
this ever happen?" asked John Cullen, of Lincoln. "We have a creeping
little casino that's getting bigger and bigger . . . without the people
having a say."
He and others from Lincoln also urged the lawmakers to stop "deluding
yourselves" and acknowledge that adding 1,750 slots to the 3,002 already
authorized is an expansion of gambling that requires a public referendum.
But the House sponsor of the BLB bill, Rep. William San Bento,
D-Pawtucket, insisted that more of the same is not an expansion of
gambling. "We have not gone from VLTs to dice to blackjack."
Describing himself as a geriatric psychologist, Dr. Ronald Stewart said
he went to Lincoln Park on "two separate occasions" and saw that "the
people who are lined up waiting for these machines are the most
vulnerable: elderly, frequently mentally ill people who are emptying
their pockets, emptying their Social Security checks, emptying their
welfare money into these machines."
"We don't see a lot of highly educated people there," he said. "We don't
see a lot of very intelligent people there."
Saying she was offended by his remarks, Rep. Anastasia Williams,
D-Providence, asked: "What does a welfare recipient look like from your
eyes, or what does an educated person look like?"
Making the same pitch she made to the Senate in May, Hurley told the
lawmakers that with a long-term deal of its own, Newport Grand would
make a $20-million investment to add more gambling space, more
restaurants and a 90-room hotel. She said her payroll of about 200
people would double.
Earlier in the day, House leaders briefed Governor Carcieri, who had a
hand in negotiating the original Senate-passed bill. Afterward, he said
the issues he cared about survived.
"From what I understand -- we haven't seen the final language on
anything yet -- they've come up with some things that BLB is prepared to
live with, then I'm fine with that. . . . They're big business guys so
they can decide whether they're happy or not."
Senate President Joseph A. Montalbano, D-North Providence, was also
generally "on board."
However, there was one change that came as a surprise to Montalbano.
The town of Lincoln, part of which he represents, currently gets 1.25
percent of all slot revenue at the track. Montalbano's version of the
bill had increased that cut to 1.5 percent on the new machines. Murphy
struck that language, keeping the town's share at 1.25 percent.
Montalbano said that increased money for Lincoln "is supposed to be in
there" and he wanted to review the bill before commenting further.
-- With reports from Liz Anderson of the State House bureau
| Summer Finally Starts for Misquamicut Businesses | |
| Archeological dig in Newport, 4 feet and 250 years down | |
| 34th Annual, Cape Verdean Independence Day festival |
More top stories
Most Viewed Yesterday
A gangster’s tale: New Dillinger film is close to the truth, Brown prof. says
Providence to host Fourth fireworks
Tough times prompt 3 communities to cancel July 4 fireworks shows
Most active surveys
Why do you think Sarah Palin is prematurely stepping down as Alaska's governor?
Is Rasheed Wallace a good addition for the Celtics?
Does Tim Wakefield deserve to be an All Star?
Most e-mailed in the last 24 hours
Reader Reaction









You must be logged in to contribute. Log in | Register Now!
You are logged in as screenname | Log Out
You are logged in, but do not have a "screen" name. Create a Screen Name