Rhode Island news
The biggest jump in fees since 1998 is being attributed in part to increased background checks and new anti-fraud technologies.
09:35 AM EDT on Monday, April 26, 2004
Carolina Bernal came to Rhode Island from Ecuador in 1987, and recently
became a U.S. citizen. Now she wants to bring her father here from
Ecuador, and if she hurries, her reunification petition will cost $130.
But if she misses Thursday's deadline, the fee will jump to $185.
The costs for entering this country, getting a green card and becoming a
U.S. citizen are about to shoot up, as the government raises immigration
service fees by $55 per application. Though the fees go up every few
years, this represents the biggest across-the-board increase since 1998.
For example, a person applying for permanent residency will now pay an
average of $745 in combined fees, up from $555. That does not include
$70 for "biometrics" (fingerprinting) -- up from $50 -- or the cost of a
physical exam.
Employers who bring in temporary nonimmigrant workers, such as seasonal
farm help, will have to pay $55 extra per person.
The government says this is the price of doing business after 9/11.
"Since 9/11, we have increased security background checks," says Dan
Kane, spokesman for the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service in
Washington. Kane says other factors driving the fee increases include
new anti-fraud technologies and higher infrastructure and administrative
costs.
The increased scrutiny includes determining "whether that person
overseas in a refugee camp or applying for a visa is the individual he
or she says they are;" whether the applicant has been involved in any
criminal activity, here or abroad; or has been connected to a terrorist
organization. "This takes time, especially if you are overseas," Kane
says.
Immigration advocacy groups predict that the new fees will prove
unaffordable for many immigrants, and are unjustified in the face of
"deteriorating services" at the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Service, including huge processing backlogs.
The groups are asking Congress to fix what they call an overburdened
system, through direct appropriations. Currently, fees provide 97
percent of the agency's revenues; taxpayers provide the other 3 percent,
says Kane.
"These backlogs today have reached crisis proportions, delaying business
transactions and separating families for months and years," the American
Immigration Lawyers Association said after the new fees were announced
last week.
The association said the immigration service plays a vital role in
determining "who is allowed into the country and who uses" its
resources, but argued that "fee-based funding does not work for American
security, American families or for American businesses."
Kane says the agency "is committed to reducing the backlogs by September
2006 for all applicants," and will soon announce a reduction plan.
Responding to critics, Kane says applicants can seek a waiver of fees if
they cannot afford them. And, he adds, the intensified screenings are
working.
"We are stopping people who do not have the right to come into the
United States. Those 19 individuals [who committed the 9/11 attacks]
came in without background checks," he says. "They had entrée into our
society, and they came here to harm us. We cannot let that happen again."
THE AGENCY DECIDED to boost its fees after a recent cost analysis --
required every two years -- showed that it has been losing $1 million
dollars a day since Oct. 1, 2003, Kane says.
Without the fees, he says, the bureau will continue falling behind in
its services, which in its first year included 35 million national
security checks "to ensure that the right applicant receives the right
benefit in the right amount of time," and to prevent the wrong applicant
from receiving benefits. (The agency, formerly the Immigration and
Naturalization Service, was established as part of the Department of
Homeland Security after 9/11).
Also in the first year, the agency eliminated lines at many high-volume
offices across the country, according to Kane, and a bilingual,
toll-free customer help line has opened.
(The American Immigration Lawyers Association calls that line "a
failure." Kane says monthly client surveys show that "80 percent are
satisfied.")
The agency has requested 142 more staff members to help catch up with
its backlog. The bureau also seeks to fund new activities, including
staff to interview refugees overseas, Kane says.
Raul Yzaguirre, president of the National Council of La Raza, says the
agency plays a vital role "for the Latino community and the entire
immigrant community, and as such, we believe USCIS must receive adequate
funding to perform its vital functions."
But that funding needs to come from Congress, not fees, Yzaguirre says.
Increased fees "are not justified in the current context of processing
backlogs and poor service" that have left countless American families
waiting to be reunited with members of their immediate family, says
Yzaguirre.
He adds, "It is also clear to us that fee increases alone will not
resolve the financial problems faced by USCIS and will not result in
better service."
AT THE INTERNATIONAL Institute of Rhode Island -- the state's largest
immigration agency -- immigration program director Bruno Sukys says he
and other frontline staff have been working long hours since February in
anticipation of the fee increases.
"We knew the fees were going to go up. We didn't know the date," says
Sukys. "We passed the word indirectly."
Though application fees have risen steadily, "you would hope the service
would get better," says Sukys, "but to be honest with you, it has gotten
worse."
Says Sukys: "Inquiries are taking longer. We are getting frustrated. The
clients are frustrated, and the immigration people are getting
frustrated."
People seeking adjustment of status, for example, from legal immigrant
to permanent residency, are going to feel the pinch, he says.
"If you're doing a package [of combined fees], right now it's up to
$555, and the next day, if you file on the 30th, it will be $745. That's
a jump of almost $200," says Sukys. For many people, "that's almost a
month's rent."
Carl Krueger, the institute's staff attorney, calls the immigration
service "the worst-run agency in federal government, and it has been for
years. And Congress has to step in and fix it."
Carolina Bernal, director of the Immigrant Workers' Rights Project at
the Institute for Labor Studies in Cranston -- and who is seeking to
bring her father from Ecuador -- doubts that increasing fees will help.
Says Bernal, "What bothers me is, every time I hear immigration is
raising the fees, they always promise they will expedite the process and
reduce the backlog, but we never see any improvement."
Projo Video
More top stories
Most e-mailed in the last 24 hours








