[an error occurred while processing this directive]
  Local News Home
  Digital Bulletin
  Blackstone Valley
  East Bay
  Massachusetts
  Metro
  Northwest
  South County
  West Bay
  Education
  Health
  Lottery
  New England
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
Local News
Council rips Laffey and Yule display

Democratic Councilman John Lanni calls the City Hall exhibit -- that mixes religious and secular symbols -- unconstitutional and a publicity stunt.

03:28 AM EST on Friday, December 19, 2003

BY BARBARA POLICHETTI
Journal Staff Writer

CRANSTON -- For varying reasons, a majority of City Council members don't like the holiday display unfolding on the front lawn of City Hall that includes decorations ranging from a Nativity scene to a parade of pink flamingos.

Many said yesterday that they agree with the American Civil Liberties Union which is opposing the display on the grounds that it is unconstitutional because it violates the principle of separation of church and state.

The ACLU said Wednesday that it will file a lawsuit in federal court against the city because of the display which is being erected -- one decoration at a time -- by residents at the invitation of Republican Mayor Stephen P. Laffey.

"Of course it's unconstitutional," said Democratic Councilman John Lanni. "He [Laffey] knows it, his lawyers know it and the average citizen knows it.

"This has been tested in just about every state in the country. And all this is," Lanni said, "is a publicity stunt for the Laffey ego. This is just so that people will know who he is when he runs for higher office."

Councilwoman Paula McFarland said that Laffey has done more than just mix church and state. "He's mixed church and commercial symbols," McFarland said, alluding to the pink flamingos wearing little red hats placed between a large menorah and a near-life-size Nativity scene.

"He's making a mockery of religion," she said. "Next, we'll have the church of Santa Claus and the church of snowmen represented on the lawn. And there's even the possibility of the church of Laffey."

Laffey, who was not available for comment yesterday, has defended the display and his policy which gives his office the authority to decide what decorations are "appropriate" and can be erected.

Laffey said earlier in the week that he did not think that the eclectic display -- which now includes three Santas, an angel, and an inflatable snowman plus the menorah, the Nativity scene and the flamingos -- is covered by a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court decision that allowed the City of Pawtucket to keep a creche in a park next to City Hall.

That decision found, in part, that the Nativity scene was just a small part of a much larger holiday diorama that included Santa's reindeer, candy canes and a wishing well.

Cranston City Councilwoman Cynthia Fogarty, a lawyer, said yesterday that she agrees with the ACLU and she is concerned that the city might have to spend taxpayers' money in court to defend the display. She is also worried about the city opening itself up to the liability of having to pay the ACLU's legal fees and other costs, if it loses.

Laffey, who yesterday was scheduled to preside over a menorah-lighting ceremony in the front lobby of City Hall, has said that he has had ample offers from local lawyers who are willing to represent the city free of charge.

He approved the flamingos on Wednesday after resident Scott Bonelli surreptitiously set them up Tuesday night along with a large sign that brings greetings from "The Church of the Pink Flamingo."

Yesterday, Democratic Councilman Kirk McDonough decried the entire display as no more than an insulting jumble of secular and religious objects.

"I am particularly offended by the novelty of pink flamingos separating the Nativity scene and the menorah," he said. "The lack of respect for the two religions is an affront to all and should be rectified immediately."

Republican Councilmen Allan Fung and Marc Ferolito both backed Laffey, saying that they thought the display was legal and not offensive. "We're creating kind of a diverse atmosphere," Fung said.

Citywide Councilman Randall Jackvony, also a Republican and the minority leader, disagreed. He said that while he does not concur with the ACLU's position, he does feel that it is inappropriate to have a display that combines a Nativity scene with a snowman and multiple Santas.

"In my personal opinion, we should take all the items off the lawn tomorrow," he said. "It's essentially making a mockery of religions when you have them next to the Church of the Pink Flamingo."

"I'm a practicing Catholic. . . and while I think God has a sense of humor, I think that there's only so far you can take it."

Councilwoman Ellen O'Hara said she agrees with the ACLU and is upset that the display is making Cranston the brunt of many jokes.

"I was sort of hopeful that we had begun to turn the corner in Cranston and get ourselves off the front page," she said referring to months of headlines about the city's fiscal woes. "But I get up this morning to find out that we are the laughing stock of the state once more."

DIGITAL EXTRA: Cast your vote on the relationship between holiday decorations and government agencies, at:

http://www.projo.com/news/poll.htm

search the archives for related articles:
[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Previous articles? Search Journal Archives

More...

printer Printer Version E-mail to a Friend Discuss in Forums
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]