[an error occurred while processing this directive]
  Local News Home
  Digital Bulletin
  Blackstone Valley
  East Bay
  Massachusetts
  Metro
  Northwest
  South County
  West Bay
  Education
  Health
  Lottery
  New England
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
Local News
Bells are ringing over wedding ceremonies

House members are objecting to a new Senate restriction on giving special permission to preside over a nuptial.

06/04/2003

BY LIZ ANDERSON
Journal State House Bureau

PROVIDENCE -- A number of couples preparing to say "I do" this summer are facing an unexpected glitch in their wedding plans: a legislative squabble at the General Assembly.

The couples are those seeking special permission from lawmakers to have a friend, family member, or out-of-state official conduct their ceremony. Such matters have usually been considered routine.

But this year, key senators balked at giving just anyone permission to preside over a duo's entry into wedded bliss. House members objected to the new Senate restriction, and the ensuing clash has ensnared every pending request.

A number of wedding dates have come and gone, requiring those couples to make alternate plans. Others have special days that are approaching quickly. Lawmakers who sponsored the bills as hometown favors are frustrated.

"If either chamber wanted to establish [new] criteria, then it should be done next year, not halfway through a session," said Rep. Bruce Long, R-Middletown, who is trying to help a couple get married by the groom's uncle, a Michigan judge. The wedding is June 21.

"People have made plans," he complained. "Now members are having to go back to their constituents and say, 'I'm sorry, there are issues certainly beyond my control that very well may prevent it.' "

State law allows a host of people to legally conduct a wedding, including clergy members, current and retired court clerks and administrators, and a variety of state judges, including magistrates and municipal court judges. Everyone else needs special legislation -- even Rep. Maxine Shavers, D-Newport, who wants to perform the wedding ceremony of her son in Newport next month.

But in March, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Michael McCaffrey announced that the Senate would approve marriage bills only if the person involved has the authority to conduct a wedding back home. McCaffrey said committee members wanted to ensure that people have some qualifications to do the job.

House lawmakers, who have tried in vain in recent weeks to push any pending requests through in omnibus bills, question why senators feel the need to wade into such details.

"In Vegas they let Elvis marry people," said House Minority Leader Robert Watson, R-East Greenwich. "If two individuals want a particular person to marry them, for whatever reasons they personally deem appropriate, I just don't see why we should be involved in superseding those decisions."

Rep. Raymond Gallison, D-Bristol, is trying to help an Attleboro lawyer get permission to perform a June 21 wedding for friends at Colt State Park. Gallison, whose bill is up for a House vote today, said he can understand the suggestion that such officiants should have some qualifications. But he notes that people could become a minister over the Internet, "and Rhode Island will accept that."

McCaffrey, the Senate Judiciary Committee chairman, said the ultimate solution is for lawmakers to hand off the responsibility for weddings altogether. He is proposing to give the governor the power to allow anyone with a clean criminal record to perform a ceremony, in trade for a $150 fee to the secretary of state.

The measure, awaiting a Senate vote, also clears the way for any federal judge to perform ceremonies here.

Sen. Teresa Paiva-Weed, D-Newport, tried to help a couple with a planned wedding in May, only to have the bill become snagged in the dispute. Paiva-Weed said she supports the Senate's suggestion for changing the process, but has concerns about ceremonies that have been "falling into the cracks" in the meantime.

Rep. Paul Crowley, D-Newport, also had a pending bill that died when the wedding date went by. Crowley said such bills are "just a service you do," often for people from out of state, and should be considered a way to help promote the tourism and wedding industry.

As the dispute drags on, lawmakers with pending requests say they are telling people to have backup plans in place, but to hang on in case the situation can be resolved.

A spokesman for House Speaker William J. Murphy, D-West Warwick, said yesterday that the speaker is hopeful it will be worked out soon.

Search the archives for related articles:
[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Previous articles? Search Journal Archives

More...

printer Printer Version E-mail to a Friend Discuss in Forums
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]