Rhode Island news
Ciccone disputes ethics complaint
01:00 AM EDT on Wednesday, May 16, 2007
PROVIDENCE — State Sen. Frank A. Ciccone III yesterday denied parts of the ethics complaint filed against him the day before and said that one element of it, his failure to disclose his union jobs in an Ethics Commission filing, was an oversight.
Ciccone, a Providence Democrat, was the target of a complaint filed by Operation Clean Government President Arthur C. “Chuck” Barton III the day before accusing him of sponsoring legislation favoring his union, not disclosing that source of income, and potentially benefiting unionized employees by participating in a legislative investigation of the Carcieri administration’s hiring of temporary workers.
Ciccone said he has two paying union jobs, one as a field representative of Local 808 of the Rhode Island Laborers International Union and another as business manager of the local. He acknowledged that he omitted them from his last two years’ financial disclosure reports, which are intended to let the public detect conflicts of interest among public officials.
“I made a mistake,” he said. “It was inadvertent.”
However, he disputed two other accusations. The legislation he supported, he said, would affect unionized school teachers, which his union does not represent. And he challenged the claim that his involvement in the investigation by the Senate Committee on Government Oversight, where he is vice chairman, amounts to a conflict of interest because the committee is investigating the hiring of temporary state employees.
Barton’s complaint argues that the issue before the commission bears directly on the number of persons who will be members of local unions represented by Ciccone’s union, meaning that Ciccone is using his office to benefit his “business,” the union.
Ciccone, however, said that’s “quite an inference to make.” The oversight committee, he said, set out to look into state government purchasing. The committee focused on the temporary jobs issue, he said, in part because the Carcieri administration wouldn’t provide the documents the panel wanted on the subject.
More top stories
Most viewed yesterday
High food costs threaten the recipe for success
Baby sitter testifies to beating inflicted on 3-year-old boy
Carcieri removes MHRH director
Route 95 bridge further restricted
Walsh sends Patriots Spygate tapes to NFL; Super Bowl walkthrough not among them
Most active surveys
Would you advise Senator Clinton to continue her campaign or drop out of the race?
What are you doing to cut food costs?
Which shortstop signing was the bigger mistake for Boston: Renteria or Lugo?
Which home-grown Red Sox starter is your favorite to watch?
Does Bill Belichick deserve any further punishment over Spygate?
Most e-mailed in the last 24 hours








