Movies
Movie Review: Funny Games, disturbing violence
01:00 AM EDT on Friday, March 14, 2008

Brady Corbet plays the sadistic Peter in Funny Games.
Nicole Rivelli
George and Anna and their little son, Georgie, live an existence of tasteful affluence rarely glimpsed outside of Ralph Lauren ads. They play “Name that Aria” with opera CDs as they tow their classic sailboat on the long drive to their gracious lakeside cabin. After they settle in, a bashful young man in preppie tennis whites comes to their door, introduces himself as Paul, a guest of their neighbors, and asks to scrounge a few eggs.
Paul drops them, then politely insists that Anna give him a few more. He is joined by Peter, also dressed to play, also blandly pushy. The tension rises and George attempts to referee the situation. Peter takes an interest in George’s golf clubs, and soon more than some eggs are broken.
Funny Games, a bloody and provocative essay in anxiety from Austria’s Michael Haneke (Cache), is a horror movie in the truest sense of the word. Its terrifying story of a family under siege examines movie violence with a cool, intellectual detachment that makes the consequences all the more disturbing.
With a few carefully rationed meta-narrative winks at the audience, Haneke breaks the fourth wall and implicates viewers in the unfolding savagery, asking why we find such tales of brutality entertaining. It’s a distancing, artificial effect, yet after a few moments we’re sucked back into the survival drama.
Although we rarely see the family being victimized — the carnage occurs off screen — Haneke lingers on its graphic aftermath and the characters’ emotional pain. Naomi Watts, as the resourceful but terrified Anna, delivers a bravura performance. Tim Roth, cast against type as milksop George, is riveting, and Devin Gearhart as Georgie is every bit the equal of his adult co-stars.
The film is a shot-for-shot remake of Haneke’s riveting 1997 German-language version, but the new edition suffers a bit for being late to the game. The audience-as-accomplice idea isn’t as novel as it was a decade ago. Mainstream Hollywood deals with the same issue regularly, most recently just a few weeks back in the Diane Lane potboiler Untraceable.
Still, Haneke’s deconstruction of violence as escapism has a perverse, European elegance. There is no musical score prodding our responses, the camerawork is languid and the matter-of-fact tone, echoed by the nonchalant sadism of the interlopers played by Brady Corbet and Michael Pitt, subverts our genre expectations at every turn.
Even if you’re already aware that violence is sickening, thank you very much, Haneke’s confrontational film stirs up distressing emotions and leaves you to resolve them as best you can. Good luck. You’ll need it. *** Starring: Naomi Watts, Tim Roth, Michael Pitt, Brady Corbet. Rated: R, contains terror, violence, profanity.
| Providence College's 'grunge' edition of Romeo and Juliet | |
| Brown engineering students race cars you can compost | |
| Ice carving: Chainsaws and chisels in the hands of Johnson and Wales chefs-in-training |
|
More top stories
Most Viewed Yesterday
Patriots journal: Porter says refs have different rules for Brady
Governor vetoes R.I. saltwater fishing license
Narragansett sachem: ‘Outsiders’ no more after Obama meeting
Most active surveys
React to Carcieri's veto of R.I.'s first saltwater fishing license
What's your favorite breakfast/lunch place?
Are the Yankees on the brink of another dynasty?
Will you get vaccinated against swine flu this year?
Will you allow your children to be vaccinated against swine flu? Why or why not?
Most e-mailed in the last 24 hours
Reader Reaction










You must be logged in to contribute. Log in | Register Now!
You are logged in as screenname | Log Out
You are logged in, but do not have a "screen" name. Create a Screen Name