[an error occurred while processing this directive]
  Local News Home
  Digital Bulletin
  Blackstone Valley
  East Bay
  Massachusetts
  Metro
  Northwest
  South County
  West Bay
  Education
  Health
  Lottery
  New England
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
Health
Raises key in Fatima nurses' vote to accept contract

08/05/2003

By S.I. ROSENBAUM
Journal Staff Writer

NORTH PROVIDENCE -- Nurses at Our Lady of Fatima Hospital voted yesterday to accept a new three-year contract in a near-unanimous landslide.

Of the 202 nurses who voted during three sessions throughout the day, only 5 cast votes against the contract.

The vote ended a period of tension which began on July 17, when the previous contract expired and union members voted -- also near-unanimously -- to authorize their leaders to issue a 10-day strike notice if they deemed it necessary.

But the strike notice never came, and yesterday evening both sides said they were pleased with the compromises hammered out in negotiations.

"It was a fair agreement," said R. Otis Brown, a hospital spokesman. "We're pleased we could reach an agreement and move on."

"We had good compromises," agreed union president Lynn Blais.

The new contract will give nurses a 10-percent raise over the next three years: 4 percent the first year, and 3 percent in the next two years.

It's one of the features Blais liked the most. "The wages kept us where we needed to go to be competitive in the market," she said.

The negotiators also resolved one of the most controversial issues -- health care -- by allowing nurses to keep their current HealthMate Coast to Coast plan while giving them the option of choosing a cheaper Blue CHiP plan. The hospital had originally wanted to switch the HealthMate plan with the Blue CHiP one.

Another contentious issue, however, went unresolved. During negotiations, union representatives had called for minimum staffing ratios as a way of ensuring the quality of care at Fatima.

The issue was not addressed directly in the new contract, Blais and Brown said.

They had slightly different explanations. Brown said other issues took precedence for the union. "They talked about it a lot publicly," he said. "It was discussed a lot at the bargaining table. But in the end wages and health insurance were the critical issues."

Blais said that other language about staffing in the contract made minimum staffing ratios less necessary. The contract establishes a committee to deal with staffing issues and concerns, she said. It also creates a "float pool" of nurses who can fill in at any understaffed department.

Other appealing features of the contract, she said, were the establishment of an orientation program and testing for new nurses, and an incentive program for nurses graduating from the hospital's nursing school to pay off their tuition if they take a job at the hospital.

While both sides were satisfied, Chris Callaci -- a lead negotiator on the union's side -- said he believed authorizing the 10-day strike notice was a helpful move toward settling negotiations.

"There's no question that that creates an environment where the parties are engaged in a much more serious way, because there's an increase in the likelihood of crisis," he said. "We're not frivolous about that stuff -- we did everything we could to make sure we didn't issue the notice."

But, he added, "The idea that we might issue [it] certainly creates an environment to settle."

Search the archives for related articles:
[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Previous articles? Search Journal Archives

More...

printer Printer Version E-mail to a Friend Discuss in Forums
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]