At the Assembly
Full House OKs ban on indoor prostitution
11:29 AM EDT on Thursday, October 29, 2009
PROVIDENCE — The House of Representatives overwhelmingly approved a bill to outlaw indoor prostitution Wednesday night, paving the way for a final debate on the Senate floor Thursday.
Related links
The bill’s passage followed an hour of impassioned debate from both sides of the issue. Supporters said the bill would provide the police with the tools they need to conduct sting operations at brothels where, they said, pimps and sex-traffickers degrade and enslave women and children. Opponents argued that it would harm vulnerable women, drive prostitution underground and cost the financially strapped state more money by sending women to prison. .
The bill represents a compromise between the House and Senate that even some supporters said was a less-than-ideal outcome of a contentious effort to close a nearly 30-year-old loophole in the state’s prostitution law.
Prostitutes who work in brothels or out of their homes would face the same criminal misdemeanor charges as prostitutes who work the street. However, the bill would empower judges to erase any record of charges for convicted prostitutes after one year.
“It’s not a perfect bill,” said Rep. Donald J. Lally Jr., D-Narragansett, “but I believe it’s the best bill we can have at this time.”
The Senate bill was sponsored by Sen. Paul A. Jabour, D-Providence; the House bill’s sponsor is Rep. Joanne M. Giannini, D-Providence.
“This wasn’t done to hurt the women,” Giannini said on the House floor. “This was done to help the victims.”
But some members adamantly disagreed.
“To imprison women because this is the only means they know to survive is shameful,” said Rep. Anastasia P. Williams, D-Providence. “There are real solutions to this problem, but unfortunately they are not in this bill today.”
Rep. Peter Kilmartin, D-Pawtucket, a former police officer, struck back, saying that women are being “imported into the state” to work as prostitutes.
“If you want to protect women,” he said, his voice rising, “you pass this law!”
Rep. Alfred A. Gemma, D-Warwick, argued that trying to outlaw indoor prostitution was similar to attempting to ban alcohol consumption in the days of speakeasies.
“This is trying to regulate morality,” he said.
Rep. Rodney D. Driver, D-Richmond, tried unsuccessfully to amend the prostitution bill to postpone enforcement until July 1, 2010, to allow the women who work as prostitutes and their landlords more time to prepare, saying “they’re not breaking the law at the present.” (The bill, as currently worded, would be effective on passage.)
The bill passed by a vote of 58-9. (Eight members, including some who spoke against the bill, did not vote.)
The House also passed a separate bill to strengthen the laws against human trafficking, by making trafficking of minors for sex a felony subject to 40 years in prison and a fine of up to $40,000 or both. The bill also would outlaw trafficking for forced labor. That bill, introduced by Sen. Rhoda A. Perry, D-Providence, was approved 54-0, with 21 members not voting. (An identical House bill, introduced by Giannini, is expected to be heard on the Senate floor Thursday.)
The House also unanimously approved a bill, introduced by Giannini, making it illegal for anyone under 18 to work in any capacity in clubs that offer “adult entertainment.” That bill now heads for a final vote on the Senate floor Thursday. The measure follows the discovery earlier this year of an underage girl who was dancing in a strip club.
KEY POINTS
Prostitution bill
Criminalizes indoor prostitution First offenders face up to $1,000 fine and 6 months in prison.
Charges can be erased A judge could “expunge” prostitutes’ records after 1 year.
Punishes ‘Johns’ Prostitutes and their customers face same penalties.
Punishes landlords Landlords who knowingly allow prostitution could face up to 5 years in prison and $5,000 fines.
The House vote Voting yes
Almeida, D-Providence
Azzinaro, D-Westerly
Baldelli-Hunt, D-Woonsocket
Brien, D-Woonsocket
Caprio, D-Narragansett
Carnevale, D-Providence
Carter, D-North Kingstown
Coderre, D-Pawtucket
Corvese, D-North Providence
Costantino, D-Providence
DaSilva, D-East Providence
DeSimone, D-Providence
Diaz, D-Providence
Edwards, D-Tiverton
Ehrhardt, R-North Kingstown
Fellela, D-Johnston
Fox, D-Providence
Gablinske, D-Bristol
Gallison, D-Bristol
Giannini, D-Providence
Guthrie, D-Coventry
Hearn, D-Barrington
Jackson, D-Newport
Jacquard, D-Cranston
Kennedy, D-Hopkinton
Kilmartin, D-Pawtucket
Lally, D-South Kingstown
Lima, D-Cranston
Loughlin, R-Tiverton
MacBeth, D-Cumberland
Malik, D-Warren
Marcello, D-Scituate
Martin, D-Newport
Mattiello, D-Cranston
McCauley, D-Providence
McNamara, D-Warwick
Melo, D-East Providence
Menard, D-Lincoln
Murphy, D-West Warwick
Newberry, R-N. Smithfield
O&rsquoNeill, D-Pawtucket
Pacheco, D-Burrillville
Pollard, D-Foster
A. Rice, D-Portsmouth
M. Rice, D-South Kingstown
Ruggiero, D-Jamestown
San Bento, D-Pawtucket
Savage, R-East Providence
Schadone, D-North Providence
Serpa, D-West Warwick
Silva, D-Central Falls
Sullivan, D-Coventry
Trillo, R-Warwick
Vaudreuil, D-Cumberland
Wasylyk, D-Providence
Watson, R-East Greenwich
Williamson, D-Coventry
Winfield, D-Smithfield
Voting no
Ajello, D-Providence
Driver, D-Richmond
Ferri, D-Warwick
Fierro, D-Woonsocket
Handy, D-Cranston
Petrarca, D-Lincoln
Segal, D-Providence
Walsh, D-Charlestown
Williams, D-Providence
Did not vote
Dennigan, D-East Providence
Flaherty, D-Warwick
Gemma, D-Warwick
Naughton, D-Warwick
Palumbo, D-Cranston
Shallcross Smith, D-Lincoln
Slater, D-Providence
Ucci, D-Johnston
SOURCE: House roll call
More General Assembly stories
State deficit plan expected next month
Fox says he paid lobbyist back for ticket to Sox game
Political Scene: Stimulus funds helped spur growth pattern in R.I.
Most Viewed Yesterday
CCRI is spread too thin to train 21st-century work force, report finds
Agent: Bay in contact with other clubs, but still prefers Boston
PC Friars open with a 96-53 blowout of Bryant
Most active surveys
Should URI consider discontinuing its football program?
What’s your customer service experience been like while shopping recently?
Most e-mailed in the last 24 hours
Reader Reaction









You must be logged in to contribute. Log in | Register Now!
You are logged in as screenname | Log Out
You are logged in, but do not have a "screen" name. Create a Screen Name