| projo.com |
Digital Extra: The Station Fire |
|
2006 EPpy Winner -- Best multimedia Providence, R.I., Overcast 48° |
|
|
|
PREVIOUS STORIES:
2003: February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2004: January February March April May June July August September October November December 2005: January February March April May June July August September October November December 2006: January February March April Latest news
95 clubs must install sprinklers, state says
From Mediterraneo on Federal Hill to Lombardi's 1025 in Johnston, the owners of some establishments say they don't belong on the fire marshal's list. 11:10 AM EST on Thursday, December 16, 2004
PROVIDENCE -- Ninety-five of 177 nightclubs in Rhode Island must
install sprinklers under the fire safety laws inspired by The Station
disaster in 2003, according to a statewide survey compiled by the state
fire marshal's office.
Of those 95 clubs, 55 must also install fire alarms that automatically
notify the local fire department when the alarm sounds. Thirteen other
clubs that meet the sprinkler requirements must install these
municipally connected alarms.
The fire marshal's study, which combined data from local fire
departments and nighttime surveys by the marshal's staff, found that 69
clubs already meet both the sprinkler and alarm requirements.
Governor Carcieri's office released the results of the marshal's survey
yesterday. The list does not include large theaters, which could come
under the sprinkler law. Fire Marshal Irving J. Owens said last night
that his office concentrated first on nightclubs. "All the others will
be addressed accordingly," he said.
The governor can expect some arguments over the list -- several business
owners interviewed yesterday insisted that they were included on the
list by mistake, that they do not need sprinklers under the law and
can't imagine how they got on the list.
The Station nightclub fire, Feb. 20, 2003, killed 100 people, injured
about 200 and provoked an overhaul of the state's fire code. Getting
more sprinklers into places of public assembly was a key goal of the
2003 legislation.
Who needs sprinklers?
That has to be determined by an inspector on a case-by-case basis. But
in general, places of assembly with occupancies above the threshold of
300 patrons will probably need sprinklers. A lower threshold of 150
patrons applies to businesses that fit the legal definition of a
nightclub -- essentially a place that makes most of its money on
beverages and cover charges, rather than food.
Under the law, nightclubs with maximum occupancies of between 150 and
300 people have until July 1, 2006, to install sprinklers. Larger places
of assembly are to install sprinklers by next July.
In this year's session, the legislature added flexibility to the
deadlines, giving the Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review the
authority to push the sprinkler deadlines as far back as 2008. Tom
Coffey, the board's director, said yesterday that the deadlines had not
been moved.
Owens said it's too soon to tell whether the deadlines are realistic. "I
think there are enough people licensed to do sprinklers [to handle the
volume,] but I'm not sure there's time," he said.
Steve Lombardi, an owner of Lombardi's 1025 in Johnston, objects to his
banquet facility appearing on a list with nightclubs. Faced with an
estimated bill of $300,000 to $400,000 to put sprinklers in his
business, he said he needs more time, and urged state officials to
reconsider whether banquet facilities should be forced to install
sprinklers.
Though his engineering design work is under way, "Come July 1, 2005, I'm
supposed to have a sprinkler system, and I can't see it happening by
then," Lombardi said. "It's really wrong to classify us as a nightclub.
Nightclubs are open late, into the morning, and some of the kids in them
are pretty intoxicated. Let's look again at this law, for existing
buildings."
Brian Casey, owner of Oak Hill Tavern, in North Kingstown, said
yesterday that his business is wrongly on the list of places needing
sprinklers. "I don't need sprinklers," he said. "I have a legal capacity
of 129." He said his local fire inspector has been through his business
and never told him he needed sprinklers.
Stephen Marra, an owner of a restaurant group that includes The Grille
on Main, in East Greenwich, has the same complaint. He can't imagine how
The Grille on Main -- a restaurant that seats 147, he says -- is listed
as needing both sprinklers and a municipally connected fire alarm. The
location was home to a nightclub under another name in the 1980s, he
said, but the place hasn't been a nightclub for years. "We've never had
a day of entertainment."
Gianfranco Marrocco, owner of Mediterraneo on Atwells Avenue in
Providence, is planning to put in a $45,000 sprinkler system, but said
he is doing so voluntarily, and was unsure why his business is on the
list. "I think they have it wrong," he said.
Evelyn's Villa, in West Warwick, meets sprinkler requirements, according
to the governor's office, but needs a municipally connected alarm.
That's accurate, said Stephen Simas, a part-owner. That alarm should be
in by April 1, he said. The cost? $30,000.
"It's an investment in your business," he said. "If there's a fire, you
know that the fire department will be there immediately."
|
Advertising newspaper adsshop & subscribe
|
|||
|
|
||