projo.com

   East Bay

Advertising

DEM sets deadline for Bay St. cleanup plan

If New England Gas Co. were to continue not to provide cleanup options, it could face fines of up to $25,000 per violation, per day.

12:59 PM EST on Tuesday, November 29, 2005

By MICHAEL P. McKINNEY
Journal Staff Writer

TIVERTON -- The state Department of Environmental Management has given New England Gas Co. a Jan. 4 deadline to state in writing that the company will provide at least three cleanup proposals for the contaminated soil affecting scores of Bay Street area homeowners. The deadline was part of a strongly worded letter stating the company failed to submit the required remediation options.

If the gas company were to continue not to provide the information, the DEM says in the Nov. 23 letter, the company may face up to a $25,000 fine per violation, per day. The DEM could issue a notice of violation and order.

Last week's letter, called a notice of intent to enforce, is a kind of warning that precedes that step. It renews pressure on the gas company and marks a turning point because, in the environmental agency's view, it is time to move from the testing phase to begin to decide how to clean up the area in North Tiverton.

"We are saying, 'Look, we want the investigation stage completed. We want a minimum of three alternatives so we can move this from an investigation stage to a decision on how the problem is going to be rectified," said Leo Hellested, chief of the agency's Office of Waste Management, in an interview.

Hellested, speaking generally about the process, said there is no guarantee fines would be imposed right away should the deadline pass without compliance. The DEM would have to consult on any matter first. He sounded hopeful that the issue with the gas company would be worked out and said the company has worked diligently on the testing.

Christopher Medici, a spokesman for New England Gas Co., said in an interview that the company received the letter and other information yesterday. "So at this point, our legal and environmental folks are reviewing all the information we received," he said, adding that at this point "we are really going to reserve comment until we have an opportunity to carefully review all of the materials received today."

Hellested said it is standard to provide a minimum of three cleanup options known as "remedial alternatives" once a site investigation is close to completion. They are conceptual alternatives, he said, and any eventual cleanup may or may not include putting some or all of them into action.

The Tiverton issue came to light in 2002, when discovery of blue-stained soil during a sewer main project in the Bay Street area first raised concern among residents. Evidence emerged suggesting the defunct Fall River Gas Co. -- which New England Gas Co. later acquired -- may have dumped waste in the area during the 1960s and 1970s from a decades-old coal gasification process. In March 2003, the Department of Environmental Management issued a letter of responsibility to New England Gas Co. for the Bay Street investigation.

New England Gas Co. hired consultants and has done rounds of soil sampling and testing on properties in the area. The company negotiated with residents to get access to properties.

In October, the second round of soil sampling found 2,335 instances of hazardous chemicals that were above safe limits on properties. That included arsenic, cyanide, lead, and benzo(a)pyrene. The benzo(a)pyrene, found in concentrations that were 285 times the safe level in samples and were dug no more than 6 inches into the ground, are the worst of the findings.

When those figures became public, the gas company had not proposed the required remediation plan, Jeffrey Crawford, principal environmental scientist with DEM, said last month. Instead, the gas company suggested "human health risk assessments," using mathematical calculations, which officials said would mean having residents agree to restrictions in their yards rather than cleaning up the materials.

Many neighborhood residents, who have been under a town-imposed moratorium that bans disturbing soil in their yards, did not go for that. Some have said they have been living in fear about what it may mean. And residents, who formed the neighborhood group ENACT, and elected officials have complained the matter has gone on too long without action.

Owners of 74 Bay Street area homes have a lawsuit pending against New England Gas Co. in an attempt to compel cleanup of the materials. The gas company has requested that the U.S. District Court dismiss the lawsuit.

Staff writer Michael P. McKinney can be reached at (401) 277-7447 or at mmckinne(AT)projo.com

ARTICLE TOOLS: Print it | Discuss it | E-mail it to a friend | Most e-mailed stories
ARCHIVES: Search for related articles:

Advertising


Advertising
Table of Contents
Home page
PROJOCLASSIFIEDS | PROJOCARS | PROJOHOMES | PROJOJOBS | OBITUARIES | IN MEMORIAMS
Rhode Island News | Business | Lifebeat | Multimedia | National / World news | Opinion | Sports | Weather | Your Turn

News tip: (401) 277-7303 | Classifieds: (401) 277-7700 | Display advertising: (401) 277-8000 | Subscriptions: (401) 277-7600
© 2006, Published by The Providence Journal Co., 75 Fountain St., Providence, RI 02902.