projo.com

   Digital Bulletin

Advertising
Conn. senator proposes federal shield law

Sen. Christopher Dodd was spurred by the case of Rhode Island newsman Jim Taricani and other judicial efforts to expose reporters' confidential sources.

05:55 PM EST on Friday, November 19, 2004

By JOHN E. MULLIGAN
Journal Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON -- Spurred by the case of Rhode Island newsman Jim Taricani and other judicial efforts to expose reporters' confidential sources, Sen. Christopher J. Dodd today introduced a federal shield law for journalists.

The Connecticut Democrat's measure, modeled after a shield law in the District of Columbia, is intended to protect individuals and organizations involved in gathering and disseminating news "from being hauled into federal court and forced to disclose their sources or other unpublished information,'' according to a statement issued this afternoon by Dodd's office.

"Democracy is premised on an informed citizenry,'' Dodd said at a Capitol Hill news conference today. ``A free press is the best guarantee of a knowledgeable citizenry.''

Journalists contend the First Amendment, which established freedom of the press, gives reporters the right not to divulge their sources. Although 31 states, including Rhode Island, also have such laws on the books, Congress has never enacted a federal shield law.

Under Dodd's bill, the federal courts, legislative or executive branch could not compel a journalist to provide the source of information, regardless of whether that person has been promised confidentiality. That right would extend to a journalists' notebooks, photographic negatives and other material.

The bill says a court could force disclosure of news in cases in which it is critical to a legal issue, the information cannot be obtained anywhere else and an overriding public interest exists in the disclosure.

In theory, Dodd's measure would cover a case such as that of Taricani, an investigative reporter for NBC affiliate Channel 10, who was convicted yesterday of criminal contempt of court. He now faces a possible prison sentence for refusing to say who leaked him an FBI surveillance videotape in violation of a court order.

Taricani, 55, is one of several journalists nationwide who are locked in First Amendment battles with the government over confidential sources.

As a practical matter, Dodd's bill will not help Taricani. The Senate is expected to adjourn today or tomorrow, so the bill will not move during this Congress.

But Lucy Dalglish, executive director of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, said Dodd's measure will serve as "a place setter'' for a sustained effort to enact a federal shield law during the Congress that will begin in January.

Dalglish said enactment of a federal shield law will be a challenge: ``To be honest, previous efforts to get federal shield laws during the 1970s and 1980s failed because the media could not agree on what they wanted.''

Dodd's office said he is acting ``in response to recent reports in which the press has come under intense pressure to reveal the identity of their confidential sources.''

Several organizations that represent journalists said they will go to Congress to ask for a federal shield law that would protect reporters from having to name their sources after a local reporter was convicted of criminal contempt.

"It is time for a federal shield law to protect reporters like Jim and those facing contempt of court rulings in other ongoing investigations," said a statement from Radio-Television News Directors Association. The organization said it would join others in asking the next Congress for such protection.

Dodd, the lone sponsor of the measure, promised to reintroduce it when a new Congress begins in January. He voiced optimism about gaining the support of Republicans and Democrats, noting that several states with shield laws are conservative, GOP-leaning states.

John Sturm, president of the Newspaper Association of America, endorsed the legislation, saying it would allow journalists to do their jobs without fear of penalty.

The New England Society of Newspaper Editors also issued a statement calling for a federal shield law.

Yesterday, Taricani called the verdict an "assault on journalistic freedom" and said he never thought he would have to serve time for doing his job.

"No reporter should have to pay such a terribly high price for honestly and legally reporting the news," his station, WJAR, said.

The tape was part of the evidence gathered in an investigation into corruption at Providence City Hall under former Mayor Vincent A. Cianci Jr. It showed a top city official, Frank Corrente, taking a $1,000 cash bribe from a local businessman acting as an undercover agent for the FBI.

The tape was aired on Channel 10 before it was shown in court during the ensuing trial of Cianci and his co-defendants on corruption charges. Cianci and Corrente were later convicted and are now serving federal jail terms.

U.S. District Judge Ernest C. Torres stressed during yesterday's hearing that Taricani wasn't in trouble for airing the tape, but for refusing to tell a special prosecutor who had given it to him.

Taricani said he promised his source he would keep his or her identity confidential.

Torres has scheduled sentencing for Dec. 9, when Taricani faces the possibility of six months in prison.

-- With Associated Press reports

ARTICLE TOOLS: Print it | Discuss it | E-mail it to a friend | Most e-mailed stories
ARCHIVES: Search for related articles:

Advertising


Advertising
Table of Contents
Home page
PROJOCLASSIFIEDS | PROJOCARS | PROJOHOMES | PROJOJOBS | OBITUARIES | IN MEMORIAMS
Rhode Island News | Business | Lifebeat | Multimedia | National / World news | Opinion | Sports | Weather | Your Turn

News tip: (401) 277-7303 | Classifieds: (401) 277-7700 | Display advertising: (401) 277-8000 | Subscriptions: (401) 277-7600
© 2006, Published by The Providence Journal Co., 75 Fountain St., Providence, RI 02902.