[an error occurred while processing this directive]
  Local News Home
  Digital Bulletin
  Blackstone Valley
  East Bay
  Massachusetts
  Metro
  Northwest
  South County
  West Bay
  Education
  Health
  Lottery
  New England
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
Digital Bulletin
Local breaking news and updates are published during business days, as soon as reports are available.
Mistrial declared in landmark lead paint trial

10/29/2002

Staff and wire reports

PROVIDENCE / Updated 5:25 p.m. -- Superior Court Judge Michael A. Silverstein declared a mistrial this afternoon in the state's landmark lawsuit against eight national corporations that made lead paint.

The six-member jury sent a note to the judge shortly after 2 p.m. that it could not reach a unanimous decision on whether the paints constituted a public nuisance. It said that none of the jurors' positions had changed since the group took a poll at the outset of deliberations on Thursday.

Silverstein asked if the jurors thought it would be worthwhile to quit for the day and return for a fifth day of deliberations tomorrow.

The jury's foreman replied, "I don't believe so, your honor."

State Atty. Gen. Sheldon Whitehouse vowed to get a new trial started, although he will be leaving office after his term ends in December. He also filed a motion asking the judge for summary judgment.

"The only concern with this delay is that more kids get poisoned, and the defendants are intransigent about doing one darn thing other than being litigious," Whitehouse said.

Jurors had heard seven weeks of testimony before beginning their deliberations last week.

Lawyers involved in the case seemed surprised. They had expected a verdict by Friday.

The jury was being asked to decide if the paints sold by the corporations two generations ago now constitute a public nuisance by continuing to poison children in Rhode Island.

Issues of liability or possible damages in the case were to be the subject of future trials, which would be heard by another jury.

Still, the decision was expected by some to have been historic, because it could have opened the floodgates for many other lawsuits against the paint companies, or deter other communities from trying.

The defendants are: Sherwin-Williams Co., American Cyanimid Co., Atlantic Richfield Co., E.I. duPont deNemours & Co., NL Industries, Millennium Inorganic Chemicals Inc., ConAgra Grocery Products Co. and Cytec Industries.

Lead paint was banned in 1978, after studies showed flaking paint or dust is harmful to children who eat or breathe it. Health problems include behavioral disorders, brain damage and even death.

During the course of the trial, lawyers on both sides portrayed dramatically opposing pictures of the dangers that lead paint poses to young children living in Rhode Island.

The state claimed the paint is a public health threat, arguing it has poisoned 35,000 children in Rhode Island since 1993. Lead paint remains in about 330,000 private homes and public buildings in Rhode Island -- about 80 percent of the state's housing stock.

The paint companies contended the problem is isolated to deteriorating paint found in homes managed by delinquent landlords or irresponsible homeowners.

More than 40 lawsuits have been filed since 1989 by individuals and communities against lead paint companies. All have failed. Rhode Island is the first state to sue the industry under public nuisance law.

-- With reports from Journal environmental writer Peter B. Lord and the Associated Press

DIGITAL EXTRA: Find out more about the trial and the state's efforts to fight lead poisoning.

Search the archives for related articles:
[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Previous articles? Search Journal Archives

More...
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
printer Printer Version E-mail to a Friend Discuss in Forums
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]