projo.com

  

Advertising

2006 EPpy Winner -- Best multimedia

Providence, R.I., Mostly cloudy 37°

Customize | E-mail newsletters | E-cards | MySpecialsDirect


April 11, 2001

Having written the column for the newspaper, I wasn't inclined to repeat my impassioned defense of Don Orsillo here. But it's drawn so much feedback -- including a very nice note from Joe Castiglione (whom I've never met), praising Don's work -- that I feel it might be newsworthy.

First, in case you haven't seen it, here's the column:

----

When you tune into the Red Sox game tonight -- 6 o'clock on NESN, which is Channel 56 on most cable boxes in our area -- listen to the voice bringing you the play-by-play. It'll be smooth and rich and utterly professional.

Then listen to the words. They'll be simultaneously spare and full, creating maximum effect with seemingly minimum effort.

Listen to it all. The descriptions will be complete and, more importantly, accurate (a baseline requirement that, for some reason, many modern announcers fail). The interaction with the analyst will be entertaining and informative. There'll be no fumbling, no stumbling. There'll be a flow of information delivered unobtrusively; never will you think, as you frequently do, that the announcer swallowed a baseball encyclopedia and is determined to spit it out in large chunks.

The Boston Red Sox made some pretty good acquisitions over the winter, but one of their best was picking Don Orsillo as their television voice on NESN.

Which is why what's happening to him these days is so ridiculous. And unfair. And maddening.

You see, Orsillo apparently wasn't excited enough at the end of Hideo Nomo's no-hitter last week to suit some radio personalities on the main all-sports station in Boston. So they've decided to make him their latest punch line, at least until something else comes along to strike their sophomoric fancy.

It's ridiculous for any number of reasons, but let's pick the biggest one: You decide to take on a Boston sports voice, and this is the one you go after? If you can't find another, more worthy target, it's not that you're not looking hard enough. It's that you're not looking at all.

It's unfair for any number of reasons, but, again, right to the top: It was the guy's first game . I realize we've become a rush-to-judgment society, but now we're casting thumbs-up or thumbs-down based on (an opinion of) one night's work?

And it's maddening for one giant reason: Orsillo doesn't deserve it.

There aren't many things in the world I truly love, but watching and listening to baseball is one of them. I listened to Orsillo during his years with the Pawtucket Red Sox. Much like Gary Cohen (who used the PawSox job as a springboard to the bright lights of New York), much like Jack Lefebvre (who never got the shot he should have gotten), I knew, when I heard Orsillo do a game from McCoy, that I was hearing an announcer capable of running in broadcasting's fast lane. The modern-day Red Sox have a history of letting this type of talent escape, which is why I was so thrilled when NESN did the right thing and brought him on board over the winter.

I say this all so definitively because the Red Sox of my youth had no such weak spot when it came to spotting on-air quality. Curt Gowdy. Ken Coleman. Ned Martin and Jim Woods. The Red Sox of my young adulthood even had Jon Miller in the booth for two glorious seasons. I recognize skill because I heard it, night after night, summer after summer.

Orsillo is in that mold. He may not be a Martin-like poet -- though he knows how to turn a phrase, like "Offerman down by way of the K" and "Done with one without a score", both from last night's telecast -- but he does the legacy of Gowdy and Coleman proud. And, five games into his major-league career, he's hardly as good as he's going to get.

The gnats of Boston radio, of course, don't want to hear any of that. Once Orsillo didn't peel the paint off the walls with hysterical screaming when Nomo completed his no-hitter, they decided they had ready-made programming for the next few days.

So here's my challenge. Tune in the game tonight. Listen to Orsillo, the young man who grew up in New Hampshire dreaming of one day broadcasting the games of the Boston Red Sox.

If you like what you hear, drop him a line. It's not easy being a target of wannabe shock jocks, and he could use a kind word these days.

Better yet, drop his bosses a line. Their e-mail address is sports@nesn.com.

Let them know what a good choice they made.

-----

It's drawn a lot of response, nearly all of it positive; as I write this, there's only been one negative letter. We'll be printing all of them on Sunday, and the Web site will pick up the file.

But the most interesting was this one:

Bob Socci

As another broadcaster "paying his dues" in the minor leagues, hoping to someday earn a major-league opportunity, I read your column with great interest and agree completely with your point of view. Sports-talk radio in most markets lacks credibility anyway, having contributed far too often to the "dumbing down" of our business and society. Instead of taking cheap shots -- which betray any semblance of professionalism -- at a guy who's honed his skills the proper way, spending time in minor-league cities and developing much like the players in the Red Sox organization, the folks who spend their time watching games on TV and casting aspersions from a studio should be rooting for him to flourish. Considering the crass nature of most sports-talk outlets, from which individuals, who rarely -- if ever -- step foot in a manager's office to question his decisions, exist simply to create a "stir," I hope the brass at NESN realize that their words are hollow. Thankfully, at least, you do.

ART: Bob's note reminded me just how much times have changed. Never have announcers been "judged" on one incident, after one game. We ourselves operate in a medium that lends itself to snap opinions, and it's the biggest alligator that I wrestle with; it's very difficult urging people to keep things in perspective! We write and say some truly flip and outrageous things in our virtual community -- not just here, but on boards everywhere; it's the nature of the beast -- and sometimes a consensus develops when someone is persuasive enough to lure a few people over to their way of thinking. And the next thing you know, what was once a fringe opinion is now an accepted reality.

Which is what I was afraid would happen with Don Orsillo. I hesitated writing the column because Don's a friend -- we don't socialize or anything, but we enjoy chatting at the ballpark and I've been on the air with him in the past -- but I believed, with all my heart, what I wrote. If I didn't think he was good, or if I thought what was said about him had any merit, I wouldn't have written anything; I'd have expressed my support to him privately and stayed silent publicly. But to let those ridiculous characterizations of his work stay unchallenged would have led to fringe opinion becoming accepted reality. I like Don Orsillo too much, and -- much more importantly -- I care about the quality of Red Sox broadcasts too much to allow that to happen if I could at all stop it.

So I tried. I don't know how much influence we have from our perch 50 miles out of Boston, but I did what I could.

They call it advocacy journalism. Normally, I'm not one to advocate journalistically.

But sometimes, you have to fight fire with fire.

 

Copyright © 2001 The Providence Journal Company
Help CenterPrivacy policyTerms of service Make this your home page

 

 

Advertising


Advertising
Table of Contents
Home page
PROJOCLASSIFIEDS | PROJOCARS | PROJOHOMES | PROJOJOBS | OBITUARIES | IN MEMORIAMS
Rhode Island News | Business | Lifebeat | Multimedia | National / World news | Opinion | Sports | Weather | Your Turn

News tip: (401) 277-7303 | Classifieds: (401) 277-7700 | Display advertising: (401) 277-8000 | Subscriptions: (401) 277-7600
© 2006, Published by The Providence Journal Co., 75 Fountain St., Providence, RI 02902.