| projo.com |
|
|
2006 EPpy Winner -- Best multimedia Providence, R.I., Mostly cloudy 37° |
|
|
|
Having written the column for the newspaper, I wasn't inclined to repeat my impassioned defense of Don Orsillo here. But it's drawn so much feedback -- including a very nice note from Joe Castiglione (whom I've never met), praising Don's work -- that I feel it might be newsworthy. First, in case you haven't seen it, here's the column: ---- When you tune into the Red Sox game tonight -- 6 o'clock on NESN, which is Channel 56 on most cable boxes in our area -- listen to the voice bringing you the play-by-play. It'll be smooth and rich and utterly professional.
----- It's drawn a lot of response, nearly all of it positive; as I write this, there's only been one negative letter. We'll be printing all of them on Sunday, and the Web site will pick up the file. But the most interesting was this one: Bob Socci
As another broadcaster "paying his dues" in the minor leagues, hoping to someday earn a major-league opportunity, I read your column with great interest and agree completely with your point of view. Sports-talk radio in most markets lacks credibility anyway, having contributed far too often to the "dumbing down" of our business and society. Instead of taking cheap shots -- which betray any semblance of professionalism -- at a guy who's honed his skills the proper way, spending time in minor-league cities and developing much like the players in the Red Sox organization, the folks who spend their time watching games on TV and casting aspersions from a studio should be rooting for him to flourish. Considering the crass nature of most sports-talk outlets, from which individuals, who rarely -- if ever -- step foot in a manager's office to question his decisions, exist simply to create a "stir," I hope the brass at NESN realize that their words are hollow. Thankfully, at least, you do. ART: Bob's note reminded me just how much times have changed. Never have announcers been "judged" on one incident, after one game. We ourselves operate in a medium that lends itself to snap opinions, and it's the biggest alligator that I wrestle with; it's very difficult urging people to keep things in perspective! We write and say some truly flip and outrageous things in our virtual community -- not just here, but on boards everywhere; it's the nature of the beast -- and sometimes a consensus develops when someone is persuasive enough to lure a few people over to their way of thinking. And the next thing you know, what was once a fringe opinion is now an accepted reality. Which is what I was afraid would happen with Don Orsillo. I hesitated writing the column because Don's a friend -- we don't socialize or anything, but we enjoy chatting at the ballpark and I've been on the air with him in the past -- but I believed, with all my heart, what I wrote. If I didn't think he was good, or if I thought what was said about him had any merit, I wouldn't have written anything; I'd have expressed my support to him privately and stayed silent publicly. But to let those ridiculous characterizations of his work stay unchallenged would have led to fringe opinion becoming accepted reality. I like Don Orsillo too much, and -- much more importantly -- I care about the quality of Red Sox broadcasts too much to allow that to happen if I could at all stop it. So I tried. I don't know how much influence we have from our perch 50 miles out of Boston, but I did what I could. They call it advocacy journalism. Normally, I'm not one to advocate journalistically. But sometimes, you have to fight fire with fire.
Copyright
© 2001 The Providence Journal Company
|
Advertising newspaper adsshop & subscribe
|
|||||
|
|
||