Subterranean Homepage News
by Sheila
Lennon
'Bottom-up' journalism from the pros
May 29, 2002 Today's weblog
Bloatware:
I asked
last week, "Except for NS7 being a 30 meg download while Mozilla is
less than 10 megs, is this merely a choice of features? Why would I use NS rather
than Mozlla for ordinary browsing and email?"
The question has been answered by David Hyatt, whom The Register describes as "a member of the Netscape/AOL project and long-time Mac nut, whose blog attacks both the creeping featurism of the Mozilla process, and the portalitis of his employer."
Hyatt
writes in his MozillaZine blog, "Mozilla is chock full of cool features,
an awesome layout engine, and (on Windows and Linux at least) is now doing quite
well in terms of performance and footprint. It's clearly a browser worth using.
"Netscape 7 also has all of these cool features, the same awesome layout
engine, and is comparable to Mozilla in performance and footprint. It does take
away a feature or two, like popup blocking, but it also adds a useful feature
or two, like spellchecking. The problem is that Netscape 7 is also loaded with
useless marketing junk, and this is where the trouble starts."
Link
to this item | Comment










