By Sheila Lennon
'Bottom-up' journalism from the pros Fair and balanced, too!
October 17, 2003 7:34 p.m. -- (Last
week's weblog)
Throwing a line to the future: The blogosphere
is outraged that N.Y. Times tech reporter John
Markoff dissed blogs in an interview (Reporter
Reminisces on Years of Covering Computer Revolution) at Online
Journalism Review -- "it's not clear yet whether blogging is
anything more than CB radio... I already have a blog, it's www.nytimes.com..."
I think blogs are great, obviously, and participatory journalism both
important and inevitable, but I don't believe in software. Many
who don't type, can't spell, lack computer access or facility, speak broken
whatever or simply aren't verbal are largely left out of blogging (even
as readers). And many bloggers seem to live largely online, making them
invisible in their communities as agents of change. (Not all, of course.)
Overlooked, and far more interesting to me, is this part of Markoff's
interview:
Q: You say you've been depressed lately which brings to mind actually
something I noted from your presentation in our last seminar, that you'd
gone from being a techno-optimist to being maybe not so necessarily
optimistic. Is that still the trend of your overall mood?
JM: I read Bill Joy's Wired piece (with great, great despair two or
three years ago. It's not clear to me that Joy was right on nanotechnology
or robotics or AI -- that's still I think pretty far-fetched stuff --
but the ability to create pathogens and biological weapons really quite
worries me. And I feel like it's just a matter of time, and that's one
of the things that makes me so pessimistic. I think there's nothing
built into the nature of technological progress that determines that
the world will get better as a whole. It can go either way and everything
just seems to look more and more bleak sometimes.
Bill Joy was one of four founders of Sun Microsystems, which he left
last month. The Contra Costa Times caught up with Joy last week (Sun
legend Bill Joy rests, for now) in Aspen, where he's very much thinking
about these sorts of issues.
His "Wired piece" is "Why
the future doesn't need us: Our most powerful 21st-century technologies
- robotics, genetic engineering, and nanotech - are threatening to make
humans an endangered species." I urge you to read it. Here's a single
paragraph:
The nuclear, biological, and chemical (NBC) technologies used in 20th-century
weapons of mass destruction were and are largely military, developed
in government laboratories. In sharp contrast, the 21st-century GNR
technologies have clear commercial uses and are being developed almost
exclusively by corporate enterprises. In this age of triumphant commercialism,
technology - with science as its handmaiden - is delivering a series
of almost magical inventions that are the most phenomenally lucrative
ever seen. We are aggressively pursuing the promises of these new technologies
within the now-unchallenged system of global capitalism and its manifold
financial incentives and competitive pressures.
For instance, a headline this week in the Guardian (U.K.) finds that
genetically modified crops -- modified to increase yield and profit --
do so to the detriment of birds, bees and butterflies.
Two
GM crops face ban for damaging wildlife:
Two GM varieties, oil-seed rape and sugar beet, face a Europe-wide
ban after long-awaited field-scale trials showed that the crops damaged
wildlife, and would have a serious long-term effect on bee, butterfly
and bird populations.
Three years of trials growing GM crops alongside conventional crops,
the largest field study undertaken, has provided a legal basis for banning
the two crops under European Union rules, which say that either health
or environmental detriment must be proved.
The government is now faced with an embarrassing about-turn on its
enthusiasm for GM technology. Loss of birdlife in the countryside has
been put forward as a key "quality of life" indicator by the
government and it is pledged to reverse the trend.
Scientists from the independent panel set up to conduct the field trials
were surprised that the results - revealed in the Guardian earlier this
month - were so dramatic. In the case of conventional oil-seed rape,
five times as many weed seeds survived, providing food for birds like
skylarks, than in the GM field. The results were uniform across the
country, giving Professor Chris Pollock, chairman of the scientific
panel, confidence that the results would be the same across all of Europe.
David Gibbons, another panel member, said the results were "unexpectedly
dramatic. There were very big differences, three to five times more
seeds, for example. There will be less food for birds if [the GM crops]
are grown commercially".
As a species, what do we value?
There
is another thrust in Joy's article -- the merger of man and machine, long
a staple theme of science fiction. If you're thinking about the
Borg (at right), you may be on the right track. If you're thinking
of an X-Files scenario, you may see those gray aliens as humans
from the future whose cloning has so threatened them with extinction that
they've traveled back in time to get some cells from us, who are perhaps
the last generation with wild, unengineered DNA. You may see The Matrix.
All of these possibilities are up for grabs in an unknowable future
shaped by powerful technologies and the struggle to control them.
A second dream of robotics (the first is that robots will do unpleasant
work for us) is that we will gradually replace ourselves with our
robotic technology, achieving near immortality by downloading our consciousnesses;
it is this process that Danny Hillis thinks we will gradually get used
to and that Ray Kurzweil elegantly details in The
Age of Spiritual Machines. (We are beginning to see intimations
of this in the implantation of computer devices into the human body,
as illustrated on thecover ofWired 8.02.)
But if we are downloaded into our technology, what are the chances
that we will thereafter be ourselves or even human? It seems to me far
more likely that a robotic existence would not be like a human one in
any sense that we understand, that the robots would in no sense be our
children, that on this path our humanity may well be lost.
Joy quotes Danny Hillis: "I'm as fond of my body as anyone, but
if I can be 200 with a body of silicon, I'll take it." (Hillis, cofounder
of Thinking Machines Corporation, also co-founded the Long
Now Foundation with Stewart Brand of Whole
Earth Catalog fame. Hillis's description
of its purpose ends with "I have hope for the future." The
current Whole
Earth website also addresses some of these issues.)
Indeed, Mondo
2000 editor and cyberpunk RU
Sirius (co-author, with the late Timothy Leary of Design
for Dying) has a new 'zine called
Neofiles -- sponsored by a nutrition supplements firm -- that kicks
off like this:
...Neophiles (lovers of the new) were contemplating a whole new set
of technical “miracles” including:
* The rejuvenation of the body and its healthy survival beyond the
natural biological life span
* Control over the molecular structure of matter (nanotechnology)
* Control over the neurochemistry of intelligence and emotion
* The easy and intuitive sharing of information and the contents of
the human imagination on a global scale
* The building of intelligent machines to accomplish previously unthinkable
tasks
* The comprehension and manipulation of the genome
* The expansion of human life into space
* Clean and plentiful energy
* The end of human scarcity
And while there is no proof that most of these goals can be achieved
in full, extraordinary strides have been made.
Here at The NeoFiles we will be exploring scientific and technological
advances towards these and other objectives over the coming months in
interviews and articles. However, the seriousness and immediacy of these
potentially life-altering developments is perhaps best indicated by
evolutions in business and culture. On the one hand, hopes are symbolized
by the long-term existence of Wall Street-ready businesses dedicated
to marvels like the expansion of maximum life span. On the other hand,
our fears are expressed by the increasingly vocal anguish of those who
see potential for disaster in these developments.
In an attempt to avert such disaster, Bill Joy is taking his cues from
the Dalai Lama:
A technological approach to Eternity - near immortality through robotics
- may not be the most desirable utopia, and its pursuit brings clear
dangers. Maybe we should rethink our utopian choices.
Where can we look for a new ethical basis to set our course? I have
found the ideas in the book Ethics
for the New Millennium, by the Dalai Lama, to be very helpful.
As is perhaps well known but little heeded, the Dalai Lama argues that
the most important thing is for us to conduct our lives with love and
compassion for others, and that our societies need to develop a stronger
notion of universal responsibility and of our interdependency...
The Contra Costa Times story about Joy today asks,
What's next?
Joy either hasn't decided or isn't saying. He mentions a need for more
security on the Internet, more reliability in software. His interests
in recent years have focused on the need for curbing potential abuses
of increasingly powerful technology, abuses he worries could endanger
mankind. Some colleagues suspect his next venture may address that concern,
if only in a small, realistic way.
When Joy chooses his new challenge, he'll tackle it with a handful
of colleagues, including Mike Clary, his right-hand man of 16 years
at Sun.
"I want to do something worthwhile that I don't think someone
else would do," Joy said. "If it's going to happen anyway,
what's the point? Why not make a difference?"
Count me in.
This is becoming a novel-length blog item, yet it's ridiculously superficial.
I hope these links seed some leaps around the Net, open some synapses
and lead to more thought and discussion about where technology is all
leading. They're truly just pointers to people who'll point you to better,
deeper places.
Like John Markoff, I'm a little depressed about how badly it could all
turn out, unless our values evolve more quickly than our power.
(I would welcome thoughts,
discussion and more pointers on these issues. This is a textbook example
of a critically important but complex story that can't be easily be covered
by the mainstream print press, most of whose reporters are hitched to
a calendar of upcoming and incoming events.)
Link
to this item | Comment
'Cosmic
talent with a child's generosity' by Fidel Castro. Really. He's
describing the great
Gabriel Garcia Marquez (100 Years of Solitude). It begins,
Gabo (Gabriel García Márquez) has confessed that it is
still on his conscience that he initiated me into what I still possess
to this day, "an addiction to easy-to-read bestsellers as a method
of purification from official documents". To which I must add his
responsibility in convincing me not only that I want to be a writer
in my next reincarnation, but that I want to be one like him, with those
stubborn and persistent details that, like a philosopher's stone, give
total credibility to his dazzling exaggerations.
The end note:
From Granma International, which has reproduced Castro's text for the
Colombian magazine Cambio, on the occasion of a special edition celebrating
the launch of the first volume of Vivir para contarla (Living to Tell
the Tale), Márquez's memoirs, extracts from which can be read
on Guardian Unlimited.
Link
to this item | Comment
FCC
action alert: Cory Doctorow of the Electronic
Frontier Foundation sounds the alarm about the "broadcast flag":
Today, we're asking for your help with the Broadcast Flag. This is
a proposed technology mandate that would give Hollywood studios a veto
over the design of the output and recording technologies that get built
into DTV receivers -- which is by way of saying the stuff that we take
for granted on our general-purpose machines, like CD/DVD burners, high-speed
cabling standards like FireWire, and so on. This is an unprecedented
maneouvre: the Hollywood studios are saying that tech companies should
have to get the studios' permission before releasing new tools to their
customers. These are the studios that tried to ban the VCR, that sued
ReplayTV over commercial-skipping, that put Fritz Hollings up to the
CPDTPA bill, a proposal to make *all* technologists get the entertainment
industry's approval before producing new equipment.
What's more, the Broadcast Flag demands that approved technologies
will have to be built to be "tamper-resistant." That means
that we'll have a law that will require an entire class of general-purpose
technologies to use only obfuscated, closed-source drivers. That's right,
it bans open source for tech that can be used in DTV applications.
There's action to be taken:
Numbers count in this fight. When over 700,000 Americans wrote to the
FCC on media consolidation, it so alarmed lawmakers that Fritz Hollings
(of all people!) called for Congressional action to limit media consolidation.
We need lots of people to write into the FCC asking them to set this
proposal aside, and we want you to help. If you are willing and able,
we'd like you to post a call-to-action on your site. You can write your
own, or feel free to re-use this letter (please omit the leading paragraph!)
or the copy on the EFF's site:
http://action.eff.org/action/index.asp?step=2&item=2801
That link contains our "action center" item, which allows
people to send a fax to the commission with one click.
You can read
the full text of this at J.D. Lasica's New
Media Musings -- which has finally settled down at newmediamusings.com.
Link
to this item | Comment
All
the President's votes? "A quiet revolution is taking place
in US politics. By the time it's over, the integrity of elections will
be in the unchallenged, unscrutinised control of a few large - and pro-Republican
- corporations. Andrew Gumbel wonders if democracy in America can survive"
the Independent (U.K.).
...It is still unclear exactly how results from these missing cards
were tabulated, or if they were counted at all. And we will probably
never know, for a highly disturbing reason. The vote count was not conducted
by state elections officials, but by the private company that sold Georgia
the voting machines in the first place, under a strict trade-secrecy
contract that made it not only difficult but actually illegal - on pain
of stiff criminal penalties - for the state to touch the equipment or
examine the proprietary software to ensure the machines worked properly.
There was not even a paper trail to follow up. The machines were fitted
with thermal printing devices that could theoretically provide a written
record of voters' choices, but these were not activated. Consequently,
recounts were impossible. Had Diebold Inc, the manufacturer, been asked
to review the votes, all it could have done was programme the computers
to spit out the same data as before, flawed or not
Astonishingly, these are the terms under which America's top three
computer voting machine manufacturers - Diebold, Sequoia and Election
Systems and Software (ES&S) - have sold their products to election
officials around the country. ...
Link
to this item | Comment
Laurable's
Poetry Weblog has lots of audio
links.
Link
to this item | Comment
Secrets
of the iPod, at TechTV.
Link
to this item | Comment
The
typewriter-keyboard conversion: "Yes, it really works. Even
down to slapping the carriage return for Enter."
My wife suffers from repetive stress problems in her fingers and wrists.
Sometime in October we were talking about different keyboards on the
market for people such as herself. In the course of the conversation
she mentioned that she finds old-fashioned mechanical typewriters much
easier on her fingers because they offer gradual resistance rather than
the feeling of moving through air then hitting a wall, like most computer
keyboards. Ah-hah, I think to myself! At last I know what I will give
her for Christmas. The first weekend after Halloween I went out and
found an old Smith-Corona and got to work.
The short how-to is thus: in a regular keyboard, each keypress completes
a circuit. There's a little circuit board in there and I mapped all
the connections from one terminal to another. This was then replicated
inside the typewriter by wires going from the circuit board to strips
of adhesive lamé, which contact their counterparts when a key
is pressed. Of course, it's a bit more complicated than that...
Link
to this item | Comment
Enjoy the weekend.
October 16, 2003 7:22 p.m.
Don't
saute the rabbi! Rabe is a vegetable that looks a bit like broccoli
with too many leaves and too few buds. It used to be found only in Italian
markets, but the Andy Boy company now distributes it to supermarkets.
It tastes very bitter if you don't "peel it" -- remove the strings
and tough stems.
Here's a recipe for Sauteed Rabe, from a 1996 Journal story by
Donna Lee about an Italian Christmas Eve feast:
BROCCOLI DI RABE
Wash one or two bunches fresh rabe well, trim off tough ends. Split
or discard thick stems.
Put rabe into big saucepan with about 1/4 cup olive oil, two or three
cloves of crushed garlic, a shake of dry red pepper flakes and salt
to taste. Add 1 cup water.
Cover and cook until tender (or tender-crisp), turning the rabe as
it cooks. Taste for salt.
Link
to this item | Comment
iTunes
for Windows is released. Link
to this item | Comment
Child's
Play:
"Would today's tykes tolerate the classic games you grew up with?"
asks Electronic Gaming
Monthly.
...we rounded up nine children of the PlayStation generation—ages
9 to 12—and forced them to play a variety of titles from the late'70s
to the mid-'80s. Now read what the little scamps had to say, plus check
their comments on a bonus game—Super Mario Bros.—that got
cut from the EGM (print) article. If you grew up with these classics,
prepare to feel very old.
Link
to this item | Comment
20
Great Google Secrets: At PC magazine, including,
Intitle: at the beginning of a query word or phrase (intitle:"Three
Blind Mice") restricts your search results to just the titles of
Web pages.
Intext: does the opposite of intitle:, searching only the body text,
ignoring titles, links, and so forth. Intext: is perfect when what you're
searching for might commonly appear in URLs. If you're looking for the
term HTML, for example, and you don't want to get results such as www.mysite.com/index.html,
you can enter intext:html.
And 18 more...
Related: A
"Fireside Chat" with Google's Sergey Brin:
(Danny) Sullivan (editor of SearchEngineWatch.com)
started things off by asking Brin when he first realized just how iconic
Google had become.
Brin said it was when he received a letter and a photo from a man with
heart pains whose family had used Google to determine if he was having
a serious heart attack. With their questions answered, the family got
the victim quick medical attention, and a subsequent triple-bypass procedure
saved his life.
Related: Getting
over Google grief : "The web has made it easier than ever to
find out what's happened to old friends. But how do you feel when you
discover that they've died?"
Link
to this item | Comment
The
real James Bond dies: Patrick Dalzel-Job, who served with Bond
author Ian Fleming during WW II in the undercover Commando 30 Assault
Unit, died Sunday at 90. The Telegraph (U.K.), in a hefty story full of
detail of his wartime exploits, reports,
During his service with the Navy, he navigated a miniature submarine;
he was a crack shot and could ski backwards; he had a compass concealed
in one of his buttons.
The
Globe and Mail adds,
Peter Jemmett, a member of Mr. Fleming's unit, said later that when
Mr. Fleming's first Bond novels appeared in the 1950s, colleagues immediately
recognized Cmdr. Dalzel-Job in the 007 character.
"In contrast to a number of people who have claimed that they
were the James Bond, Patrick has never made any fuss about it,"
Mr. Jemmett said.
Cmdr. Dalzel-Job later acknowledged that Mr. Fleming had told him he
was the basis for Bond, but added: "I have never read a Bond book
or seen a Bond movie. They are not my style. ... And I only ever loved
one woman, and I'm not a drinking man."
Born in London, Dalzel-Job lived in western Scotland, The village of
Plockton devotes
a page to him on its
website. The page leads with a photo of his 1991 autobiography, From
Arctic Snow to Dust of Normandy, and the quaint note,
The author will sign copies in person at his house. (Please phone first.)
Link
to this item | Comment
The
100 greatest novels of all time: A British list, it begins with
Don Quixote.
Link
to this item | Comment
"The
Techno-Impressionist Museum hosts the world's largest collection
of Techno-Impressionist art, from the earliest known works to the present"
writes artist/founder Tony
Karp. " Techno-Impressionism is the last art movement of the
20th Century."
The 21st Century Techno-Impressionism section:
This is an exhibit of art that does not yet exist.
It's a look into the future of Techno-Impressionism.
How did we do it? Take a look for yourself.
Note: this exhibition may take a while to download as it is coming from
the future.
via Artchive.com
Link
to this item | Comment
Mozilla
1.5 released: For Windows, Mac OS X and Linux (as well as the
more arcane operating systems AIX, HPUX,
OpenVMS and OS/2), it's allegedly the last version of the integrated browser-mail-newsgroup-composer-irc
client. A speedy stand-alone browser (Firebird),
mail client (Thunderbird)
and many more components are being created by a far-flung corps of volunteer
developers and a tiny staff at the Mozilla
Foundation. (After AOL bought Netscape, which had assigned staff to
Mozilla development, it cut Mozilla loose in July but gave $2 million
to the Foundation, which is chaired by Lotus founder Mitch
Kapor.)
The Mozilla.org
site has also been redesigned, and seems to me to be appealing to
those who might be turned off by the utilitarian appearance of many of
the old
site's pages.
Mozilla is aiming
at end users now, not just early adopters: Mozilla
Charts an Independent Course at eWeek.
Link
to this item | Comment
Dear
Mr. G.W. Bush / Re: Your recent submission: (link fixed)
The Missouri Review sends a polite rejection of the President's recent
poem, then deconstructs offers suggestions for its revision.
Link
to this item | Comment
Papal
Chase - Will the next pope be black, Hispanic, American, a Jew?
At Slate.
Link
to this item | Comment
Every
Second Counts: A game. Can you hold down your cursor for .2 seconds?
How about 1.4 seconds? You can learn to. I did.
Link
to this item | Comment
The
beer church: "Because beer is good and you are worthy."
Link
to this item | Comment
October 15, 2003 7:30 p.m.
Tiny blog today -- playing catchup after my extended weekend, and
the Red Sox are distracting everybody. Baseball
Blogs is where it all plays out. The
Red Sox blogs are here.
Sci-fi
writers on Schwarzenegger:
The Infinite Matrix asked
a few Sci-Fi writers, editors, and physicians for pithy comments, and
this is what we got. Some are pithy, some not.
Among the commenters: Ursula Le Guin, William Gibson, Harlan Ellison,
Cory Doctorow and Rudy Rucker.
Link
to this item | Comment
On Rush: Most of the reaction to Rush Limbaugh
is predictable -- liberals trying not to gloat, conservatives calling
him a victim of back pain.
Indymedia
Italia, while leading the page with a photo of a bombastic Limbaugh
with a bad case of red-eye, has more detail than I've seen anywhere else.
They look into Rush's previous rehabs -- probably an overnight
stay at the Addiction
Recovery Institute -- his back pain and more, and picks up on a New
York Post item ("Sources have told The Post that Limbaugh may
have checked himself into the upscale Sierra Tucson facility in Tucson,
Ariz.)
Sierra Tucson, which bills itself as "more than a drug treatment
center, as it is dually licensed to handle psychiatric issues as well
as many types of addiction," has a gauzy, soothing, vague website.
At metafilter,
the comments are full of related links -- including "Tommy
Chong has begun his prison sentence." Chong's crime was selling
waterpipes on the net. They threw the book at him for his celebrity --
nine months in a federal prison.
The funniest potential outcome: Rush
Limbaugh Leaves Rehab, Says He's Now Liberal.
Link
to this item | Comment
On
iTunes, Napster, and eMusic, Among Others: Blogger Derek Slater
-- a junior at Harvard College. -- reviews the newest offerings in digital
music. via Scripting
News.
Link
to this item | Comment
Subterranean Homepage News
by Sheila Lennon
features & interactive producer of projo.com |